2014-10-23

Good Rx- a great app

A New App to Help you Find the Right Price-
For Prescriptions

UPDATE 1/29/15

I wrote this note some months ago, and just today, Good Rx let me know that 7 patients in the practice have used it and saved a total of $980.68!  (NOTE:  I have NO relationship with Good Rx, I do not collect any fees from them, or the drug stores.  I only recommend it as a fellow consumer and advocate for your family).

Take a look at GoodRx

It's an app that will, based on your location, and the medication your are buying, lists the cost of your prescription at area pharmacies, and available coupons.

Some of the ranges can be quite dramatic- one place may tell you that it will cost you $100 and another, with coupon, $30, for example.

Once you locate the best price, many pharmacies will then price match.

So take a look, see if it helps.


Dr. Lavin


*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

What is a Virus?

What is a Virus?

In the last few months, three viruses have gripped our attention.  The influenza virus because of a few weeks of possible flu immunization shortage, the emergence of the Enterovirus D68 a summertime virus that turned into a real attack on the breathing system, and of course, the Ebola virus.

And, of course, we all know about colds.  Everyone gets them, they cause so much agony, and they are so common.

All these, and many other infections are caused by a very peculiar type of life, the virus.  So we thought it might be interesting to present in a little more detail what is a virus.

The Basics- what's in a virus, how do they work?
Viruses are the simplest and one of the oldest forms of life.  Other forms of life include the bacteria, the yeasts and fungi, the animals, and the plants.  All these forms of life consist of either single cells (bacteria, yeast), or groups of cells (fungi, animals, and plants).  But not viruses.  Viruses are the only type of life that has no cell.  Because they are not cells, some even wonder if they are really alive.

But all agree that viruses can reproduce and adapt, so by that skill many consider them very much alive.

Viruses are also a very old form.  They are at least several billions year old.  Compare that to the current human line, which at most is  150 thousand years old.  No comparison.

Viruses do reproduce and change, but can only do so using some other form of life's cells.  No cells, no viruses.  Without their own cells, how do they reproduce and evolve?

The answer is very interesting.  They are actually packages of information.  Every virus has a bit of genetic material (DNA or RNA) inside, wrapped in a protein coat.

The protein coat picks the lock to the cell that virus can infect.  Once inside, the protein coat then delivers its inner contents, the genetic core, to the cell's genes.  There the virus takes over the cell's machinery and forces it to spin out a huge number of copies of the viral genes and their protein coats. In this way, one virus in one cell can lead to the creation of a staggering number of new viruses, ready to repeat the cycle over again.

Why Viruses are Often so Specific to One Type of Life
So this means that to live, a virus has to find a way into a cell, and a way to go from cell to cell.  This is no mean feat, in fact it is astounding.  It is so challenging, that with few exceptions, every virus can only get into the cells of one species.

The cold virus for a chicken can only give chickens colds.  Measles virus can only give humans measles.  Other viruses can only infect certain bacteria, others only one species of plant, and so forth.

There are also viruses that have figured out how to crack the code of various species, usually on type of life.  So there are viruses that can infect several animals.  But there are few, if any, that can infect various animals and plants.

Perhaps the most prolific virus is the influenza virus which infects nearly all humans during the winter, but only infects animals in the spring and summer- usually barnyard animals and birds.

How do Viruses Make us Ill?
The answer to this question has two answers:
1.  Viruses destroy cells
2.  Viruses change the function of cells

In many of the most common and mild viral illnesses, like colds and flus, viruses actually destroy the cell they use to reproduce.  Remember that the way all viruses work is that their genetic material takes over the host cell gene machine and forces it to make copies of the viral genes, to make more viruses.   If in that process a zillion viruses are copied, the cell often pops from the expansion, and dies, releasing the zillions of viruses.  This kills the cell.   If enough cells die, then a patch of tissue is left destroyed and inflamed.  This is what happens to your nose when you get a cold.  It really is very much like a mild burn, the lining of the nose gets destroyed by viruses popping sheets of cells.
Any viral infection like this makes us ill by literally burning away a sheet of cells, causing pain, inflammation (this is where fever comes from), and lost of fluid leaks (runny nose, vomiting, diarrhea, for example)

Sometimes, though, the cell is not exploded from rampant viral copying.  In these situations, the virus still takes over the cell's gene machine, but the virus has it create an ongoing production line of viruses, not enough to pop the cell, so the cell continues to live, but it stops working normally.  The most famous example of such an infection is AIDS, where the cells of the immune system are infected but not destroyed.   In many ways, we are better off with viruses that kill cells, especially if they are superficial cells, for then the body makes new, healthy cells to replace the dead ones.  But if the cell lives and lives well enough, it will continue to work (even if abnormally) and this can cause much and long-lasting dysfunction and trouble, as in AIDS.

And then, some viruses can lie dormant for years.  They insert there genes into the host cell and then just sit there and do nothing.  In this situation the person is not ill, but if the virus kicks on and starts making tons of copies at some point, an illness could erupt.  This is the story of chickenpox and shingles, where once the chickenpox illness is over, the same virus just sits dormant in the cells near the spinal cord.   Every now and then they reactivate, travel down the nerve to the skin and this is shingles.

How do we Recover from a Viral Illness?
The only way our body can recover from a viral illness is to kill every cell that is actively infected with a virus.  We can't actually kill a virus since on its own it is hardly alive.  But if our body kills every cell that contains a certain virus, then that virus will be cleared from our body.  This strategy works only if the body can identify every cell containing that virus and kills all of them.
And, this is exactly what happens in colds and flus.  Our body goes after every infected cell, and the infection and virus is completely eliminated, new cells are made to take the place of those destroyed by the virus, and we heal.
If our body cannot do this, the viral infection becomes chronic, like AIDS, and many hepatitis viral infections.
And, in the case of dormant viruses, the body leaves these alone, the cells that contain the virus look no different from normal cells because the virus is not doing anything, so the infection is lifelong, but dormant, like dormant chickenpox that simply sits there unless a shingles flare occurs.

How do We Treat Viruses?
A handful of viruses can be cured by treatment with anti-viral drugs, viral antibiotics.
These include influenza, hepatitis C, and some herpes viruses such as CMV and herpes simplex.
In each of these examples, the drugs do help, but are not 100% effective.

But, for nearly all other viruses, there are simply no drugs that actually kill the virus, speed up the healing from all the havoc they cause, or even end the symptoms they create.  This is most vividly experienced with common colds and stomach flus, where drug stores have shelves bursting with products promising an end to runny noses and coughs, or diarrhea, but always fail to deliver.  At this time about 500 drugs promising relief from viral symptoms are under investigation by the FDA for false claims. Five hundred such drugs under investigation!

Two viral symptoms that can be treated by drugs are fever and pain, and we recommend ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) over acetaminophen (Tylenol) due to questions about whether acetaminophen may boost the development of asthma.

How do we Prevent Viral Infections?
We are all strongly drawn to the idea that if we simply take this or that action, we can stop the spread of viruses through a classroom, school, or home.  The evidence, however, is overwhelming that viruses travel from person-to-person astounding well, despite kids being kept home when ill, despite hand-washing, despite nearly any effort.  Just looking at the sweeping waves of viral infections that cover continents in a matter of days dramatizes the fact that trying to stop a virus from spreading, especially common, very contagious ones, is like trying to stop the wind.

Given that very few viruses can be treated, and none of the very contagious ones can be stopped from spreading, that leaves us with only one control measure that has had any real impact- immunizations.

The body has figured out how to protect itself in one of the great triumphs of clever evolution, one we recover from a virus, it is almost always the case we cannot get it again.  If you get measles, you never get it again.  If you get cold variety #281, you never can get sick from cold #281 again (of course, you can still get cold #282).

This very natural, very important key to our survival is the whole basis of the idea of immunization.  If you can't get a viral illness twice, why not deliver a very mild case of that illness, so when the real thing comes along, you can no longer get it.

Do immunizations work?  Just take a look around.  Smallpox in the 20th century killed 500 million people, more than World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, and all other wars in that century, combined.   But because of immunization, and only by this strategy, smallpox is now eliminated from the planet.  It worked.

And, it has worked in every case- measles, mumps, rubella, even chickenpox, hepatitis B, polio, all are sharply reduced.  In areas where immunizations are used by nearly everyone, these diseases are essentially eliminated.


Bottom Lines
1.  Viruses are curious packages of genes wrapped in proteins.  The proteins gain access to the target cell, the genes make the cell make more viruses.
2.  In destroying the cell, the virus causes the illness.  When sheets of cells are destroyed, the illness is where the irritation takes place- runny nose in the nose, sore throat in the throat, cough in the lung, diarrhea in the gut.
3.  Only a small number of viruses can be killed by a medication, almost none of their symptoms can be relieved by medication.
4.  It is next to impossible to stop the spread of a very contagious virus.  Some viruses are quite rare and do not spread well, and these are the very, very rare examples of viral infections that can be controlled by containment (e.g., SARS, Ebola).
5.  The only action that has ever really spared us from the diseases caused by viruses has been immunization, which has had a spectacular and dramatic record of success.


To you health,
Dr. Lavin




*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2014-10-22

Thoughts on Crying in Infancy

When Babies Cry- What are they Saying, What can You Do?

Everyone alive has felt the power of a young baby crying.   Their cry for help pierces our minds, demands a response, and leaves us suffering if no response happens, quickly.

All parents have felt the tie their baby's cry creates.  All airline passengers have felt the power of a baby's cry.

But what is the baby's experience of the cry, and what sort of response is the baby looking for?

At one level, nothing could be more obvious about an infant's crying- it is simply a cry for help.  To be held, to be fed, to be cleaned, to be helped.

But it may be helpful to think for a moment about the situation we all find ourselves in when we were infants, needing some way to communicate with the world.   As full grown adults we have a tremendous range of ways to communicate with the world.  We can talk, email, text, video call, even write letters.  Our communications can be crafted to the most subtle level of nuance.  We can describe with great accuracy exactly what we are wanting, and we can do so directly, indirectly and with a broad pallette of emotional flavoring.

An infant's communication situation could not be more different.  The infant has no words, none. This leaves all communication forced into a very narrow range of choices.  For the newborn who also has not yet learned to use their hands or face, and so cannot even gesture or smile, there are very, very choices to get a message of any sort out to the world.  For the first days after birth, babies cannot even fix their eyes in a gaze.

In fact, the only communication channel open to a very new newborn is crying and some very rudimentary grunts and breathing noises.   Crying is the main vehicle for newborns to communicate.

Equally interesting is how very wired all adults are to the communication of infant crying!   That is the power of the baby's cry.  After all, if we did feel the urge to respond, the cry would never work.  But we do feel it, our minds create a very, very powerful urge to do something.  As parents, we are compelled to find out what our baby wants and make sure it happens, as an observer we are compelled to pray that the parent is around and can do something to quell the cry.

What do Babies Want?
If the cry of a newborn is their total communication channel and medium, what are they communicating? 
The list is very familiar to all, here is the list and what to do:
  • "I am hungry"   Feed your baby
  • "I want to be held, cuddled, rocked"  Hold the baby and provide the requested comfort]
  • "I want to go to sleep"  Initiate the sleep routine that helps your baby get to sleep
  • "I want my diaper changed"  Change the diaper
  • "I am in pain"  Find out what is causing the pain (e.g., a bad position, a reaction to a food, a stomach ache, etc.)
Bottom Line
Crying is often experienced as a crisis.  The baby is crying, now what do we do??
But if we see crying as the newborn's way of talking writing, and emailing us, we can respond to it as we would any communication:  figure out what the person is asking for, and respond accordingly.
This approach sets up a nice dance of parents and their young babies communicating and connecting and caring for each other.  Crying moves from hazard to connection.


Dr. Lavin



*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2014-10-20

Ebola- Finally some good news in the US

Ebola- Finally some good news in the US
[updated October 20, 2014 11:34 AM]

As those who have followed our account of the story of the Ebola virus in the US already know, there has been no Ebola virus epidemic in the United States to date, and the chances of one actually occurring have been very low all along.

Today, the first actual data on how well an exposure to Ebola virus in the community can spread in the US has been reported.  The information comes from Dallas, Texas, the only city in the nation where Ebola has spread, so far.   

As we all know that spread to date has been to a total of two people.   These two people, and the original patient, have been found to have exposed 149 people in Dallas and two flights, one to Cleveland and one from Cleveland.  

Today we now know how many of the first 43 [was reported as 50 earlier today] of these 149 exposed people actually caught Ebola virus infection from these two nurses and the patient.  These 43 are the first of the 149 to be tested and fully monitored for the full 21 days needed to prove or disprove if they caught the disease.

And how many of these 43 people were proven to catch the Ebola virus?  The answer is zero!

Not a single person of these first 43 to be observed for a full 3 weeks caught the virus, none of them!

We of course need to wait a full 21 days for the rest of the 155 in Dallas and on the planes, and for another 153 people here in 16 of Ohio's counties to know for sure if the patient and Dallas and two of his nurses spread Ebola to anyone in the United States.  Note that another 5 people in Dallas are so far negative and are only a few hours from full clearance later today.

But these initial results from the first 43 exposed Americans to reach the 21 day waiting period mark could not possibly be more reassuring.  A very low rate would have been better news than a high rate of contagion, but zero transmission across 43 people clearly bolsters the evidence that this virus is not very contagious.

One of the 43 who did not catch it was a man who used the ambulance used by the actual patient in Dallas to get to the hospital before the ambulance was cleaned.   The fact that he did not catch it increases the chance that people on the nurse's plane but not same flight are more likely to be safe, too.  Another two, lived with one of the nurses who got infected, the one who did not come to Ohio.  One of these two people was her fiance who cared for her while ill at home and the other her child who lived with her.  Both of these people with very close contact were cleared today, they did not catch Ebola.

The fact that 0 of 43 exposed people caught Ebola should go a long way towards reassuring all of us in Ohio that the risk of an Ebola virus outbreak or epidemic in Ohio is exceedingly remote.  We have every hope that the next days will establish that there is no Ebola risk in Ohio.

Again, until all 258 in Texas and Ohio, who are waiting to be cleared like the 43 already cleared, are cleared, caution and concern are still in order.  But indicators are good that there will be on Ebola crisis here, at least for now.

To your health,
Dr. Arthur Lavin



*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2014-10-17

Ebola Update- A Broader View, and a Clarification from Hathaway Brown

Ebola Update- A Broader View, 
      and a Clarification from Hathaway Brown
[as of October 17, 2014 at 8:45 AM]

As we take a look at the state of the Ebola virus in the United States at this time, a few key observations seem most relevant:

  1. We have had two phases of the infection, and wait to see if other phases will develop or not.
  2. The first phase was the arrival in the United States of a small handful of people who got the Ebola virus infection in Western Africa, primarily Liberia.  By a small number, we mean less than a dozen.
  3. The second phase has been the spread of Ebola virus from those infected in Africa to people in the United States.   At the time of this posting, a total of two people have been infected in the United States.  Further, everyone who has actually been infected by Ebola virus in the United States has gotten infected only by caring medically for a person ill with Ebola.
  4. There has been no third phase of infection at all so far.  Of course, it is too early to know if there will be a third phase, but as of today, we know of no one who has actually been infected by either of the two nurses, the only people who actually got infected to date in the United States.
The Broad View, Right Now

These facts lead to the following observations:
  • Ebola is a scary illness because it is so deadly and there is no specific treatment for it.
  • There is no Ebola epidemic active at this time in the United States.  Out of a population of 300 million people to have a disease spread to a total of two people does not constitute an epidemic.  
  • It is also striking that the only people who have caught Ebola infection in our country were two nurses who were placed in very close physical contact with an infected person's bodily fluids.  Early reports suggest their infection may have resulted from breaches in protocols that can protect medical caregivers.  If so, the only documented infections in the United States, to date, are the result of something almost none of us will be actually experiencing- providing very close medical care with someone dying of Ebola infection and doing so with breaches in the proper technique.
  • At the same time, very careful vigilance is in order to prevent or minimize a third wave of infection, the spread of the Ebola virus from the two nurses to others.
  • The main observation to make at this moment is that although Ebola is raging in Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea, it is really not raging in the United States.  At this time, there is very little danger of infection to nearly all of the 300 million people who live in the US.
  • And again, the experience of Nigeria is instructive.  Even if a third wave of infection occurs, this disease is containable, and I have every confidence that if a third wave occurs, the US will be able to keep it from actually moving into epidemic mode.  That is, we are all very safe right now, and the outlook remains very good that we will continue to be safe.
The Clarification from Hathaway Brown

A number of highly reputable news sources reported yesterday that at student at Hathaway Brown was asked to remain home yesterday because the infected nurse who flew from Cleveland had visited the home of a Hathaway Brown student.  Please note that these news reports, and my posting, were very clear to avoid stating or implying that anyone else at Hathaway Brown actually was exposed to a contagious person.

Hathaway Brown has clarified what took place.  It does turn out to be true that Hathaway Brown asked a student to stay out of school pending further information, and asked her to stay home because of a possible exposure.  The clarification is that the exposure was not to the infected nurse, but to a person who was a passenger on the plane with the infected nurse.  But that passenger and the infected nurse shared a flight on October 10, not the 13th, that is, the flight to Cleveland, not from Cleveland. At that time the infected nurse was most certainly not contagious, if it remains true that her first symptoms occurred on October 13.  As Hathaway Brown put it in their statement, they asked their student not to attend school for now, out of "an abundance of caution."

In re-reading our post yesterday, it is clear that our message was not that any risk of infection with Ebola had come to the Hathaway Brown community.  This welcome clarification from Hathaway Brown makes this point even more emphatically.  These facts, as we currently understand them, establish that the student was never in contact with anyone who could have been contagious.  It makes sense for any school to be cautious, we make no comment on the whether the student should attend school or not, or when.  But we can say with this clarification, and assuming no new facts emerge, we still have no reason to believe anyone in NE Ohio is infected with Ebola virus.

Bottom Line
This virus is very scary, for good reason.  Fortunately, it has not spread in the United States to any degree that makes us think we are in any danger.
Let us hope this remains the case, even if several more cases of infection are identified.
Here is to your health, and to this threat passing as soon as possible.

Dr. Lavin




*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2014-10-16

A Masterpiece- A New Book Presents a Magnificent Treatment on Thoughts on Immunizations

A Masterpiece
A New Book Presents a Magnificent Treatment on Thoughts on Immunizations

On Immunity:  An Inoculation
by Eula Biss, Greywolf Press, 2014

Many people, families and doctors both, have struggled with questions relating to immunizations.

It turns out these questions have a rich and compelling history, and also relate to very powerful trends in concerns that inform our current society.

For families and doctors alike, it only helps to better understand the questions and concerns that are raised surrounding immunizations.

Now comes Ms. Eula Biss who is an award winning essayist and observer of our society, with what I think may be the best book ever written on the topic of immunizing, and perhaps on the overall topic of medical care.

This book stands out for several reasons.

First, the author is an outstanding writer, so it is a great read, well crafted, deeply thoughtful.

Second, the author is recounting her own recent experiences of giving birth, experiencing crises, living through weighing scary choices.  This is not a dry listing of various arguments for and against immunization, but a deeply felt exploration of what it is truly lived when you have to decide amongst conflicting choices for the health of your baby and child.

A third distinction, is that Ms. Biss takes a very serious look at all the concerns raised by immunizations.  She discusses each concern in its deep historical and societal context.  It turns out people have been concerned about immunization for many centuries.  Also, many of today's concerns about immunizations are rooted in very deep trends in modern American society.  Ms. Bliss presents each of these concerns, their history and their context in an incredibly thorough and open-eyed manner.

As a result, Ms. Bliss has created a book that should be read by every doctor and by any parent with any questions about immunizations at all.   It's an important book for doctors, because it gives a clear picture of what families are contending with whenever they make any medical decision for their loved ones, in particular immunizing their children.  It's an important book for parents, because it presents one of the best and most thorough discussions of current concerns available.

I have found the debates surrounding immunizations too often sink into stalemate.  On one side are the scientists, armed with powerful facts about what life is like without the protection of immunizations.  On the other side are organizations militant against immunizations, presenting frightening scenarios of possible harm.  The scientists have little patience for worries in the face of facts.  The opposition has little patience for those who do not take their sense of potential harm seriously.  As a result, facts have little impact on those worried; and, worries have little impact on those with facts.  Stalemate.

This is the special power of On Immunity: An Inoculation.  I think it breaks the stalemate with poetry.  This is not a scientific paper, and it is not a cry of terror.  It really is a poem.  It is a set of essays, there is no formal chapter or topic organization.  Each essay is a very poetic reflection on what this Mother's thoughts were on this or that issue that immunization confronted her with.   The special power of a poem leads to everyone being able to relax and consider the issues at hand.  It allows for facts and feelings to come together towards figuring out what makes sense.

Here are a few choice examples from the book, that hopefully will demonstrate that this is a special read.
  • On fear and facts, Biss notes that the noted philosopher, Cass Sunstein has observed:  "Perhaps what matters," Sunstein muses, "is not whether people are right on the facts, but whether they are frightened."
  • On the nature of danger from a substance:  "For toxicologists, 'the dose makes the poison.' . . But most people prefer to think of substances as either safe or dangerous, regardless of the dose."
  • On the appeal of alternative medicine:  "One of the appeals of alternative medicine is that it offers not just an alternative philosophy or an alternative treatment but also an alternative language."  This launches a very interesting exploration of the power of the concepts of being "cleansed," "supplemented," protected from the corrosive effects of oxidation.
  • On the development of two sides to the immunization debates: "These dualisms pit science against nature, public against private, truth against imagination, self against other, thought against emotion."
  • A powerful experience in being denied access to her child during a procedure: "The implication that I was a hysterical woman and a threat to my child was making me so angry that it seemed possible I might actually become hysterical."
  • On the Sears approach to immunization: "The Vaccine Book is not even-handed as much as it is equivocal."
These examples are just a small sample of her eloquence, passion, thoughtfulness, that allow a very full treatment of today's debates on immunization.

The book is also a treasure trove of interesting facts.  For me, one of the most powerful was that smallpox, once truly a great killer, was a killer up until its end.  Smallpox was made extinct from the natural world in the 1970's.  The virus only exists today in the military labs of the US and Russia.
But prior to its elimination, smallpox killed 500 million people, just in the 20th century.  Smallpox killed more people in the 20th century than all the wars of the 20th century, combined!

This fact reminded me of a very central fact about viruses.  Medical science, with rare exceptions, has been unable to find any treatments to rid us or effectively manage or limit the harm of a viral infection.  The only real exception to this is the use of immunizations.  The smallpox example is very relevant.  Without smallpox vaccine, the world's first immunization, it would be killing about 500 million people a century, even today.  Instead, it is now effectively extinct.  Remarkable.

I will not go into any further details, but rather leave you to enjoy this extraordinary book, a most helpful guide, and incredible read.

To your health,
Dr. Lavin






*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

Ebola Update- Solon and Hathaway Brown

Ebola Update- Solon and Hathaway Brown
This morning, two schools in Solon- the middle school and the Parkside Elementary School- and the Hathaway Brown School took steps relating to the Ebola virus.

In Solon, a staff person in the middle school was said to be on the same plane, but a subsequent (not the same) flight, as the nurse who flew from Cleveland to Dallas on October 13.  The two schools are closed today for disinfection.

At Hathaway Brown, a student was said to have had contact with the infected nurse who was visiting NE Ohio, and that student is not attending the school today.

In both instances, Solon Schools and the Hathaway Brown Schools are taking precautions.  There is no indication that anyone in NE Ohio, or any part of Ohio actually has an Ebola virus infection, even today.

In the case of the middle school staff person in Solon, being on a flight following the infected nurse's flight, even on the same plane, should not pose any risk to that person getting the Ebola virus infection.  But, even if that person did, she would not be contagious for typically a couple of weeks, and so could not be contagious now, and is very very likely not even infected at all.

In the case of the student at Hathaway Brown, it is again, likely that she is not infected.    But, even if someone did get infected this week, again, they would not be contagious now.

This note is no comment on the decisions taken by the Solon Schools or the Hathaway Brown School.  They have all the facts of their situation, we do not.   But it is clear that these steps were taken, as a precaution, not because anyone else in Ohio has been found to be infected with the Ebola virus.

Precautions are quite fine and prudent, of course, but the message has to be very clear: there is no Ebola virus epidemic in Ohio, or even one threatening to occur.

Again, we appreciate that even the mention of Ebola virus in our own community is a frightening event.  We take your concerns very seriously, and respect the concerns of all involved.

We will continue to update you as information becomes available to us.

Right now, the situation is actually quite good and reassuring.  To the best of everyone's knowledge, there are no people in Ohio currently infected with Ebola virus.  Steps are being taken to track and contain any such possibility.  And so today we are safe, and the outlook is excellent that we will remain so.

Dr. Lavin

*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.