2011-09-14

HPV in the News: A Review of the Basics

HPV in the News:  
A Review of the Basics

You never know when or which topic in science will become a hot topic in politics, but when science and politics mix, the facts usually take a beating.  This is not because politics sets out to wage war on facts, but rather that politics always has a goal in mind, and it typically is happy to twist a few facts to reach that goal.

We have seen this all in play during the recent explosion of interest in the HPV vaccine by those some politicians vying to become their party's nominee to be president.  The controversy surrounds a 2007 executive order as governor by one of the candidates mandating that all middle school girls in the state be immunized against HPV infection.  Other candidates reacted strongly to that decision in a recent debate, and suddenly HPV immunization leapt to the headlines.  Large numbers of people began registering their anger at the idea that government could force someone to be immunized, and bristled at the idea that families could be forced into decisions that could promote promiscuity.

Given the furor over HPV, we thought it would be timely to take a step back from the political excitement and think about just what this virus is, what the immunization does, and how to make a good choice for your family.

What is HPV?
HPV stands for human papilloma virus.  This is the virus that causes all warts.  The word papilloma is the Latin way to say wart.  So the HPV is the virus that causes warts in humans.  

The HPV is different sort of virus.  Most viruses make you sick, but with one exception, HPV does not.
All infections with HPV cause an infection isolated to the one spot the virus has landed.   At that spot the skin is goaded into making more skin, causing a lump of skin material to form, the lump that we call a wart.  That lump of material, with one exception, causes no harm.  Often the virus can sit in the skin without any lump appearing, but with lump or no lump, the virus can sit in its spot under the skin for a very long time, sometimes for decades.  It looks like it can sit there for such long times precisely because it is very quiet about its business.  Often not spreading to other spots in the skin, and really not doing much where it sits.

Consider how strikingly different this is from the usual virus, say the virus that causes the common cold, the rhinovirus.  Once the rhinovirus lands in your nose, it starts a real fire.  It burns off the lining of the nose, and in  rapid sequence goes on to burn the lining of the throat, all the sinuses, and then the entire lung.  The burning only stops once all the linings are burnt.  Luckily for us, the burn is very shallow, so it is not dangerous, but it causes all the suffering of a cold- fever, feeling lousy, achiness, cough, and a river of mucus wherever the virus has been- nose, eyes, throat, and lungs.  The whole infection causes an uproar in the body with a big response from our immune system that kills the invader and ends the infection.  The whole drama is over in 1-2 weeks.

HPV does none of that.  As we noted, it does not spread well, wherever it sits it causes little harm, and it can stay in its quiet, isolated spot for decades, not weeks.

There is one exception to this peaceful portrait of HPV.  That is the ability for infection with HPV in the area of the cervix to start a sequence that can end in cancer.  The cervix is the neck-shaped end of the uterus that lies at the top of the vagina.  HPV infection of the cervix by certain subtypes of HPV, can start a process that allows cells there to start growing in a disorganized fashion, and sometimes that can end up with a cancerous tumor called cervical cancer.

It is worth repeating that HPV infection is not rare.  Essentially every single person will come into contact with the skin HPV's.  The skin HPV's are spread by simple contact, and appear to be a nearly universal experience.  The genital HPV's spread by sexual contact, but are nearly as common, causing infection in as many as 75% of all humanity.  As such HPV is, by far, the most common sexually transmitted disease (STD).

So HPV causes three types of warts.  The common warts of the external skin.  Genital warts in men and women.  And the special genital warts of the cervix that can become cancer.  Since each type is caused by a separate type of HPV, an immunization against one type of HPV will protect against the infection that type causes.

Of course, only the HPV that causes serious disease, the subtypes that can lead to cervical cancer, has been targeted with an immunization that can prevent HPV infection.  That means the HPV shot only prevents infection with the HPV's that cause infection in the cervix of the uterus, not the ones that cause common skin warts.

This is a smart choice.  After all would one rather have a shot that prevents harmless skin warts, or one that prevents a type of cancer that kills more young women in the world than any other?

What is the HPV Immunization?

What does the HPV shot try to do?   Prevent cervical cancer
Of the many types of HPV that cause infection of the cervix and that can then lead to cancer, the HPV immunization prevents infection from the HPV's that are most likely to lead to cervical cancer.  That is not all HPV's and it not all the HPV's that cause cervical cancer.

So the first thing to say about the HPV immunization is that it does not protect against all HPV infections and cannot prevent all cervical cancer.  But it does protect against the HPV infections that are responsible for roughly 70-80% of all cervical cancer.   Not a bad start.

Does the HPV shot work?  Yes
The next question is how well HPV immunization works.  The answer is that it works very well.  If you get HPV immunization before you are exposed to cervical HPV, that is before sexual activity begins, it will block infection with the HPV subtypes in the shot.  And it looks like it lasts.  Since the HPV's are so widespread, people get exposed to them for a very long time and this acts like a booster for the shot, helping it provide protection for many, many years.

Is the HPV shot safe?  Yes
As those familiar with Advanced Pediatrics know, we take do not allow any representatives of the drug industry to be in our office and accept no materials from them, all in effort to be sure when asked about their products, that we can offer the most trustworthy observations that science can provide, as free as possible from market influences.

It is with this commitment and approach in mind that we took a look at the facts of how safe this vaccine is.

The data are very strong and compelling that this is a safe vaccine.

The list of possible side effects are limited those seen with any shot- irritation, allergic reactions, fever, headache, and fainting.  That's about it.

Like with any intervention, however, when upsetting events happen after the intervention, one cannot help but believe the intervention caused it. This is the power of guilt by association.  A good example would be getting a haircut and then right afterwards getting into a car accident.  The accident did immediately follow the haircut, and so is definitely associated, but did the haircut cause the accident, clearly not.
Just so, there have been stories circulating that a person became mentally impaired after getting this shot, but there is no evidence that this shot causes any sort of mental impairment.  The impairment may have started on the day of the shot, but there is no reason to believe the shot caused it.

A wide body of study has looked carefully at whether the HPV immunization causes serious problems, and the observations are strong, consistent, and reassuring, the HPV immunization does not cause serious problems.

How to be immunized against HPV?
Immunization to prevent HPV infection takes three shots.  The second dose has to be 1-2 months or more after Dose 1, and the third dose 6 months or more after Dose 1.

It is best to be immunized before you get exposed to HPV, meaning before sexual activity begins.  If people are immunized in middle school or early high school, that seems to provide the best timing.

Keep in mind that human papilloma viruses (HPV's) can cause three types of infection in people- common skin warts, genital warts, and cervical warts.  Only the cervical wart infection can lead to cancer.  And that is why the HPV immunization only protects against the HPV's that cervical wart subtypes.

This is good to remember, because it introduces a difference in benefit between boys and girls getting HPV immunization.  Boys can only get two of the HPV infections mentioned, skin and genital wart infections.  So even if a boy gets an infection with a subtype of HPV that can cause genital warts, that virus cannot physically ever lead to cervical cancer, boys do not have a cervix.   Girls, of course, can and do get all three type of HPV infections.

As a result, if a girl gets the HPV immunization, she may prevent developing cervical cancer someday.  No boy will ever have that benefit.

So why immunize boys?  For the same reason we immunize everyone for rubella (German measles).  Rubella is a very harmless infection for children and adults, but deadly and deforming to the developing fetus.  We actually never immunize those really at risk for rubella, the fetus.  Instead, we immunize everyone else, all children and adults who need it.   That immunization offers essentially no benefit to those immunized, but since we all agree to be immunized, no fetus can be exposed.  This strategy has led to the nearly complete disappearance of all fetal rubella infections, a stunning triumph.

Just so with immunizing boys against HPV.

Remember, as many as 75% of all humanity, is infected with genital HPV.  It is literally everywhere.
Boys carry it as much as girls.  So it does help to immunize all girls, but it is not enough to prevent all the cervical cancer that we can.  If boys get immunized too, it greatly strengthens the defence against these HPV infections.

So we recommend boys get immunized, knowing that they will never gain the benefit of cancer prevention, but knowing that if they do get immunized it will help prevent cervical cancer in half of humanity. And, the boys will have fewer genital warts, offering some benefit.

BOTTOM LINE
American presidential politics have thrusted HPV immunization into the nation's spotlight.  As is to be expected, the discussion has promoted the temptation to throw facts out and let strong feelings carry the argument.

But when it comes to your child's health, it makes sense to take a step back, a bit of a breath, and try to base decisions on facts.

The salient facts are these:
  • The human papilloma viruses (HPV) cause warts on our skin, genitals and the cervix of the uterus.
  • HPV infects nearly all of us.   The skin types are likely present in all people at some time.  About 75% of people,  men and women, are infected with genital HPV.  The genital HPV in women is the major cause of cervical cancer.
  • HPV immunization can prevent infection with the subtypes that cause cervical cancer in women.
  • The HPV vaccine works and is safe.
  • Sadly, politics is having some of its way with science, obscuring facts, trying to raise fears, hopefully the facts can help you keep your focus on keeping your children healthy.
Dr. Arthur Lavin






*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2011-08-31

Flu Vaccines for 2011-2012: Flu Shot Days set for September 10 or 17

Flu Vaccine 2011-2012

Advanced Pediatrics is pleased to announce that this year’s influenza immunizations are now available in our office.

Call now for your appointment on September 10 or September 17 for our Flu Vaccine Days.

Influenza is a virus that sweeps across our region every winter, typically appearing in December and leaving our community around April.

This virus is responsible for a rather astounding amount of winter illness, causing fully 1/3 of all colds, flus, and ear infections.

Influenza immunization is now recommended for everyone, except for those less than 6 months old.

Influenza immunization comes in two formats:  a shot and a nasal spray.  The shot contains dead virus and is fine for anyone to use.  The nasal spray contains live virus and should not be used by anyone less than 2 years old, older than 50 years old, or anyone with a chronic illness, including asthma.

With regard to how many influenza vaccines is a complete series, the answer is very simple.  Anyone under age 9 who has never had an influenza vaccine, needs two influenza vaccines at least one month apart to be fully protected.
That also means anyone who has had an influenza vaccine in the past only needs one this year.

Overall, the data show that the nasal spray tends to work a little better- the immunity covers more strains than are in the vaccine and lasts longer.  But, at the same time, the shot works quite well, too.

Getting Your Influenza Vaccine at Advanced Pediatrics

In order to make sure the entire practice gets the chance to be protected from influenza infection in a timely and easy manner, we are going to offer influenza vaccinations in two ways:

  1. Any child in the practice 6 months of age or older can get their influenza vaccine at any visit to office, whether it be for a health supervision visit (check-up), sick visit, or conference.
  2. We will once again offer special Flu Vaccine Clinic days to allow a large number of people the chance to simply come in and get their flu vaccine in a few minutes time.

The Flu Vaccine Clinic days will be held on two Saturdays in September:
September 10 and 17, each starting at 9AM.  You can call now to set up your time for these days.

The outlook for our supply looks good, no shortages are expected.  And the H1N1 strain is once again included in this year’s flu vaccines, eliminating the need for a separate flu vaccine routine.
Even so, we would like to limit our flu vaccine offerings to children in families.  Once we are truly sure that no shortages are expected will be opening up flu shot availability to parents.

We at Advanced Pediatrics are very pleased to be able to help make sure this winter is as healthy as possible.

Dr. Arthur Lavin
Dr. Julie Hertzer
Ms. Kelley Muldoon Rieger






*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2011-08-23

New Book by Dr. Lavin: The 5 most important things To do during pregnancy to insure the health of your new baby.

Dr. Lavin's Newest Book:
The 5 most important things 
To do during pregnancy to insure the health of your new baby

Advanced Pediatrics is pleased to announce the publication of Dr. Lavin's 5th book, The 5 most important things To do during pregnancy to insure the health of your new baby  (Collaboration Press, 2011).

This book was written for pregnant women who are seeking substantive information about what can they do to make sure their newborn is as healthy and smart as possible.   In this book, Dr. Lavin takes a look at the following 5 areas in which mothers can have an impact on the health of their baby:
  • Nutrition
  • Mood
  • Exercise
  • Cognition
  • Planning
In each instance The 5 most important things offers parents-to-be solid advice about how each of these areas can impact the outcome of newborn development, and what the mothers-to-be can do to make a positive difference.

The 5 most important things is being distributed at no cost to pregnant women.  This availability has been generously supported through a welcome collaboration with Berg's Baby and Teen Furniture store (http://www.bergsbaby.com/), a place of rare commitment to high quality, and rated as one of America's top baby stores.

Copies of The 5 most important things To do during pregnancy to insure the health of your new baby   are available at our office, again at no cost.

If you are pregnant, or have friends or colleagues who are pregnant, let us know, we would be happy to get a copy of The 5 most important things To do during pregnancy to insure the health of your new baby to them.

Dr. Arthur Lavin

also by Dr. Arthur Lavin:
Who's the Boss? Moving Families from Conflict to Collaboration, with Ms. Susan Glaser (2nd edition, Collaboration Press, 2010)
Baby & Toddler Sleep Solutions for Dummies, with Ms. Susan Glaser (Wiley Publishers, 2007, to be translated into Italian in 2012)
The Advanced Pediatrics Guide to Newborns, with Dr. Julie Hertzer, Ms. Kelley Muldoon Rieger, and Ms. Susan Glaser (2nd edition, Collaboration Press, 2009)
The Advanced Pediatrics Guide to Finding a Medical Home for Your Child, with Dr. Julie Hertzer, Ms. Kelley Muldoon Rieger, and Ms. Susan Glaser (Collaboration Press, 2010)

and, Dr. Lavin is currently working on a new book Not To Worry, which will discuss dozens of common and not so common situations, to let families know when the situation is worrisome and when it is not.





*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2011-08-16

Mosquito Bites on the Face: When to Worry

None - This image is in the public domain and ...Image via WikipediaMosquito Bites on the Face:  
When to Worry

A warm hot summer has yielded an explosion of mosquitos in our area, and with the jump in the number of mosquitos has come a dramatic jump in the number of mosquito bites.

Recent reports document this is happening and that we can anticipate a big jump in the number of mosquito bites through October.

At the office, we have seen the beginning of this big jump, with a large increase in the number of calls about mosquito bites.

Families have expressed two types of concerns about mosquito bites, are the infected, and is it really just mosquito bites or possibly chickenpox.

Mosquito Bite Basics
As the picture above shows, mosquitoes are tiny insects that live on the blood of animals they bite.  To make their living, they must slide a tiny tube into a blood vessel and suck some blood out the tube, all without you noticing in time to smash them.
Aside from being noticed and killed, their other challenge is to make sure your blood does not clot while their snout is in your capillary.
Here is why most people get a reaction.  To keep your blood from clotting during their visit, the mosquito first injects a little anticoagulant.  This material has an impact on your immune system, and this impact leads to inflammation at the site of the bite.  It's this inflammation that causes the very familiar sight of a mosquito bite, namely, a red bump, often with a tiny dot in the middle where the bite occurs, and surrounding redness:



Another basic to keep in mind is that the younger you are, the more vigorous your immune system, and so the more dramatic inflammation from mosquito bites can be.  Think of how young children can easily generate fevers to 105, but adults rarely go past 102.  Just so with mosquito bites.  Young children can get quite big red areas from even one bite.

Chickenpox
Now, take a look at this picture of the rash of chickenpox, and you can see why it makes sense for people to wonder if their child gets a bunch of mosquito bites, whether it really is mosquito bites or chickenpox:


But there is a difference.  Notice that chickenpox nearly always ends up having three types of rash:
starts with red spots which become blisters, which become scabs.  The red spots of chickenpox and small mosquito bites look about the same, really quite similar.  That makes the two conditions confusing to sort out.

In a few days the red spots of mosquito bites are still red spots, or gone, or scratched to scabs; but the red spots of chickenpox become tiny yellow-filled blisters that we call vesicles.  These vesicles then turn into scabs without any scratching.

Of course, if you are not sure that your child's mosquito bites are not chickenpox, feel free to call.
Hopefully this guidance will help, but should not stop you from inquiring.

Is the bite infected?
The other major concern that mosquito bites cause is whether the bites are infected.  This is most commonly feared when the mosquito bites are on the eyelids.
Take a look:

What do you think, is this eyelid infected?  Let's talk about mosquito bites and infections, then you decide.

The skin of the eyelid is very loose and capable of rather impressive swelling.  Even a simple mosquito bite can cause swelling enough to close the eyes shut.  The inflammation of a mosquito bite causes a lot of fluid to accumulate in the eyelid, especially if you lie down for a night's sleep or a nap.  The swollen eyelid has a pale pink color, is not warm, often only involves one lid- just the upper or lower.  The redness of the swollen eyelid from a mosquito bite is pale, not deep red, and the swelling is soft, like a partially inflated water balloon.  The eyelid feels a little bouncy, not hard.  The eyelid can be itchy, not typically painful, and often there is a red dot where the bite occurred.

When an eyelid is infected, all those properties of the eyelid are different.  Infections almost always spread to both eyelids, the redness is deep not pale, the eyelid feels hot and often hurts, and there can be pus.  The whole look is more like an angry red, hot appearance, and not the soft watery pale red of a mosquito bite.

Now with that in mind, what do you think of the picture of the swollen eyelid, mosquito bite or infection?
The answer is mosquito bite- only one lid, the upper is swollen, the redness is faint, the swelling is soft looking.

One last clue, swelling from mosquito bites almost always gets worse after lying down for awhile, since most of the swelling is simply water accumulating in the area.  Sitting or standing helps the fluid move and the swelling gets better.  This is why when young children get a mosquito bite on their eyelid, they frighten parents after sleeping- their eye is swollen shut!  But ofter after an hour or so of getting up, the swelling is much less.
Swelling from infections almost never shrinks after getting up.

Again, these tips are meant to help.  Of course, if questions still remain feel free to call us.


BOTTOM LINE
The key points to keep in mind are:

  1. This looks like a big year for mosquitoes.  Expect lots more bites, more swollen eyelids, more patches of great numbers of bites.
  2. Chickenpox and mosquito bites look alike early on, but mosquito bites stay looking like mosquito bites and chickenpox rashes become tiny blisters and scabs.
  3. Mosquito bites on the eyelid typically cause big swelling, but the redness is fainter, the pain is less, the spread is limited, compared to actual infections.
  4. Call if you are concerned.
Dr. Arthur Lavin









*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.
Enhanced by Zemanta

2011-07-06

Outcomes: The Importance of the Long View

Outcomes:  
The Importance of the Long View Or
Why Medical News Keeps Changing Sides

We have all experienced the confusion, and at times aggravation, of being told one thing about a medical risk factor today, only to be told the opposite tomorrow.  Today coffee causes bladder cancer, tomorrow it does not.  Today sunlight is harmful, tomorrow it is beneficial.  And so it goes for so many, many items.

An article published in the July, 2011 issue of our lead journal, Pediatrics, helps all of us think about how to judge how things really turn out.  http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2011/06/29/peds.2010-2782.full.pdf+html

The article looked at  1245 children whose speech developed at the usual rate, and about 142 children who were considered a bit slow to gain speech abilities by age 2.  The standard was being able to say 50 single words and say 2 or 3 word phrases.

Here is where it gets interesting.  If you looked at the 2 year olds, the ones with slower acquisition of speech skills had more behavioral and emotional problems than the typical group.  Had the study stopped there, you would seen in the news that kids who develop speech more slowly have more behavioral and emotional problems.  Two year olds who could not say 50 words would suddenly become deemed abnormal.

But this study looked at these children for many years and measured behavioral functions at ages 5, 8, 10, 14, and 17 years old.  In each instance, no difference between those kids who could say 50 words and those who could not was seen at ages 5, 8, 10, 14, and 17!  Thus, there is nothing abnormal about learning to say 50 words after age 2.

A similar problem is seen when looking at the impact of ear infections on speech development.  If you look at 2-3 year olds, you will find frequent ear infections are associated with a slow down in language development.  But if you look at the same group at age 7 or older, you cannot tell which children had any ear infections, the groups' language development became equal! 

BOTTOM LINE
Always look at the timeline when judging outcomes.  Some outcomes take a while to see.  Abnormalities are exaggerated when too short a time is given for people to develop.  When one looks at too short a time frame, many more children get pegged as abnormal who actually will turn out to be quite normal, quite fine.


Dr. Arthur Lavin





Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2011-07-05

Time to Find the Cause of Autism

Time to Find the Cause of Autism

To our mind, the autism epidemic remains the only serious and large scale epidemic in which thinking about finding the cause has been controversial.

Typically, when terrifying outbreaks erupt, two imperatives compel all to act- avoiding being the next victim and finding the cause to put out the flames.

In the case of autism, a welter of distractions have effectively blocked even the attempt to really find the cause.  A great deal of time and money have been wasted on a futile debate about immunizations, tremendous energy has been spent arguing about even whether autism is more common each year, a large percentage of research dollars have been devoted to measuring the effectiveness of a broad array of therapies none of which claim any chance of cure, and another large percentage of research dollars have been consumed with risk factor rather than causation research.  In each instance, research is not being devoted to finding the cause of a disaster that now puts over 1% of all children born in the US at risk.

Today, July 5, 2011, The New York Times published an article on a publication that suggests that the autism epidemic indeed has a cause, and it may be environmental.
The article discusses findings from a study of identical and fraternal twins.  Of course identical twins have 100%  (roughly) of their DNA in common.  Fraternal twins have 25% of their DNA in common (the Times reporter stated erroneously that the number here is 50%).  So if autism is solely a genetic problem we would expect identical twins to have 4x the chance of both having autism than fraternal twins.  They do not, and so a level of environmental cause is found.

Of course, as the article notes, it would make little sense to think that the actual cause of autism is genetic.  The epidemic began around 1990 and has been booming ever since.  No genetic changes happen that fast.

What the article does not mention, is that genes and environment are quite intimately linked.   Consider the case of lead poisoning.   In a house where lead levels in the dust are high, typically only a few children will develop high blood lead levels, even if all eat the same amount of lead.  This is because people vary in their ability to absorb lead that they eat.  One could say that the gene for absorbing lead is causing the lead poisoning.  But it would be far more accurate to say that lead is the cause, and the gene opens the door to the cause working.

Our stance for many years has been that something is causing a horrific epidemic across the developed world.  This something is now pushing over 1 in 100 babies born into a life with autism.  Certainly genes must play some role in deciding which child will be affected, but the evidence is compelling that something in our world is causing this.  It may turn out that the cause can be eliminated, as was the case with lead, and that this epidemic can be stopped like so many before it.

We call on our community, including our political leadership, to push for finding the cause.  Imagine how horrifying it will be to find out something could have been done to prevent the thousands of cases of autism developing right now, and how wonderful it will be done.

Dr. Arthur Lavin




*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2011-06-23

The Checklist Problem: OverDiagnosing Mental Health Disorders

The Checklist Problem: 
Over Diagnosing Mental Health Disorders

Diagnosis can be a tricky thing.  Two errors always haunt the process- diagnosing a problem that is not there, and not diagnosing a problem that is there.  For any problem, both these errors are always possible, and happen often.

In the realm of mental illness, one approach has led to an explosion of the first sort of error, diagnosing a problem that is not there.  I call this problem the checklist problem, and the trouble comes from a very simple mistake that is very hard to detect.

The checklist problem occurs when someone concludes that a person has a diagnosis based on a list of symptoms that could be caused by more than one problem.  An easy example that is somewhat silly is the mistake that would occur if we told everyone who came to our office with a fever that they had malaria, since everyone with malaria has fever.

This example dramatizes the fact that diagnoses are really subsets. What we mean by that is that if we look at everyone in the world who has a fever right now, a subset of those people will have the condition malaria.

Our brains have a great deal of trouble with subsets.  We tend to think that subsets and the main set are the same.   A good example of this trouble comes when we think about another symptom, strep throat.  Now most people with who are sick with strep throat have a sore throat, so most people who are sick with a sore throat really wonder if they have strep throat.  But only about 30% of people with sore throat have strep, and if you have no fever, and have a cough, that number drops quite a bit.  Even so, if you have a sore throat, it is hard not to think you have strep, because everyone with strep has a sore throat.


When it comes to mental health issues, the checklist problem really takes off.  That is because in the 1970's Robert Spitzer took over the creation of the new edition of the DSM and in 1980 the third edition, or the DSM III, was published.  Dr. Spitzer was an avid advocate for the use of checklists, and the publication of the DSM-III marked an historic shift towards the use of checklists in the diagnosis of all mental health problems.  Since 1980, the DSM has served as the reference for defining all mental health disorders in the United States.

Here is where such an approach gets into real trouble: cause.  Notice that no checklist can address the question of what is causing the symptom.   The DSM may list 20 or so symptoms for a condition, and require you have 8 of them to qualify, but it says nothing about finding a cause for the symptoms.  We do not operate this way in physical illnesses.  To return to strep throat, just because sore throat is a symptom of strep, we do not tell people they have strep throat solely on the basis of having a sore throat.  We look for the cause by testing for the presence of strep germs in the throat using a throat swab.  No strep, no strep cause, no strep throat.

For children, no diagnosis has suffered more from the problem with checklists without looking for actual causes of symptoms than AD/HD.  The DSM lists a little over 20 symptoms seen in AD/HD, some to do with inattention others with hyperactivity/impulsivity.  If you have more than a certain number, you have AD/HD.
The DSM always provides a waiver, concluding every diagnostic definition with the caveat that you do not have this problem if some other cause is found.

But wait a minute.  It turns out there are many, many causes of these symptoms.  Another silly example.  Let's say I have excellent attentional abilities, and am reading a book very intently and successfully.  But suddenly a branch snaps and falls on my foot shattering my bones.  I will no longer be able to pay attention to my book.  If I looked at my symptoms at that moment, I would be very inattentive, likely hyperactive, and appear impulsive as I howl and jump around in pain.  I would, technically, meet many criteria of the DSM and some, just hearing my symptoms might wonder of I have AD/HD.   Even without trees falling, other causes can create the symptoms of AD/HD besides AD/HD.

A short list would include a host of cognitive dysfunctions such as working memory deficits, slow processing speed, dyslexia, math learning disorders, writing learning disorders, anxiety disorders, depression, conflicts with teachers and/or parents, personality disorders, and many, many more.  Each can create just the right mix of symptoms to clearly meet the DSM definition of AD/HD, but one would never know another problem is causing it besides AD/HD without looking.

And so, this is the heart of the checklist problem- you can be positive by checking off symptoms on a checklist for a condition, and not have the condition.  Why?  Because checklists cannot prove cause.


Bottom Line:
Whenever a mental health condition is being considered for your child(ren), be sure that a diagnosis is never made solely on the basis of a checklist, make sure qualified professionals have helped you determine the real cause of the symptoms before you diagnose.


Dr. Arthur Lavin







*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.