2014-11-12

Ebola Update November 12, 2014 Good News

Ebola Update
November 19, 2014  The Facts Hold, Ebola Fades


First of all, thank you to everyone who has responded so enthusiastically to this series on the Ebola virus.

This update will hopefully be our last for some time on the occurrence of Ebola virus infection in the United States.

And, the update is quite good- as of now, we know of no one present in the entire United States who is infected with Ebola.  The feared spread of Ebola never happened in this country.

It is worth a moment to reflect on the course, not of Ebola, but our fear.

The fear was not surprising given how deadly this disease is, in fact.   Fear is a natural response to a threat, particularly one that is unfamiliar.

What was disappointing was how little the impact of the actual facts of the matter had on our fear across the nation.

And the fact that no one in the United States is currently infected with the Ebola virus confirms every fact put forward in discussions of this virus.

The key facts were very simple:
  • The Ebola virus is not contagious when you first get infected, but gets more contagious as the disease progresses, becoming very contagious as the infected person nears death from the illness.
  • The virus cannot be spread once it dries out.  That means to catch it you need wet body fluids contacting an open surface in your body.  Saliva and sweat can spread it, but dried out droplets from cough and sneeze cannot.
  • This disease is very containable.  With proper isolation techniques, the spread of Ebola can be reliably stopped.
If we had really thought about these three facts, the visit of an infected nurse who was not very ill to Ohio should have caused no concern in Ohio.  And, as it all turned out, not a single person in Ohio she contacted caught her Ebola, not a single person.  More dramatically, if we look at the entire planet of 7 billion people, the complete total of cases of Ebola seen in any country outside of Africa is a grand total of 15 to date.  This is indeed dramatic proof that this virus can be contained.

I am also very relieved to see that all but two of the patients infected with Ebola treated in the US (all but two caught it in Africa) survived.  There appear to be treatments available that work well.  The two deaths, including one just this week, were in people whose infection was in advanced stages before arriving in the US.

Of course, biology can be complicated, and viruses evolve, so I am very pleased, and relieved the nature of Ebola virus and its three key facts did not change.  It is really because of these three facts that no one in the US has the infection.

Bottom Line
  • There is no Ebola virus infection in the United States today.
  • The three key facts about Ebola have turned out to remain true, making the threat from Ebola, even in the future, quite tiny to Americans in the US.
  • Treatments are in development that worked quite well.
  • Thanks to all who have found these posts helpful

Dr. Arthur Lavin


*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2014-11-04

Flu Immunization Update- New Shipment of Shots Due at end of Month

Flu Immunization Update:
New Shipment of Shots Due at end of Month

Today marks the completion of two of our three FluFest 2014 sessions.   The program has been a big hit in large part due to the generosity of Mitchell's Ice Cream, making a scoop of their great ice cream or sorbet available to those getting their flu immunizations on FluFest days.   Our last FluFest session will be Saturday, November 8.

We have also just received notice that a shipment of the flu shot for older children (age 3 and up) has been delayed to the end of the month of November.  At this time (November 4) we have no flu shots for older children in hand, but we will be getting a shipment in a few weeks, by December, we are told by the drug manufacturer.

We have abundant supplies of flu shots for infants and young children (age 6 months to age 3 years) and plenty of the nasal form (FluMist) for anyone in good health over age 2.

Many thanks to all the families for protecting your children and participating in FluFest 2014.  It is such a pleasure to see everyone, we are very happy we were able to make it more fun this year.  And, most importantly, we have seen this active influenza immunization program really drop the chances of getting a cold or flu in January-March.

Here is to your health!

Dr. Lavin


*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2014-10-30

New Guidelines for Bronchiolitis- What is it, what to do?

New Guidelines for Bronchiolitis- 
What is it, what to do?

New guidelines for care of infants with bronchiolitis have just been published.  This is a wheezy viral infection in young infants.  The new guidelines offer a great opportunity to re-think just what is a wheezy infection, what is bronchiolitis, and what do the new guidelines teach us?

Background on wheezy colds
Every winter, colds and flus come to make us sneeze and cough, and overall cause a tremendous amount of misery.

About a third of these respiratory infections are caused by the now famous influenza virus, and yearly influenza immunization has worked well to dramatically drop the number of colds and flus we get.

But influenza only causes one-third of such infections, there are lots of other viruses out there to cause colds, including rhinovirus, adenovirus, RSV, and others.

For many children, these respiratory infections cause other problems in addition to sneezing, coughing, fever, and feeling lousy.   Perhaps the most common additional symptom is wheezing. 

Wheezing happens when the small airways- the tubes in your lungs that are smaller than your big airways like the trachea, but bigger than the tiny air sacs- get swollen,  make extra mucus, and narrow from muscle tightening around the airways.

This wheezing is different than the sneeze and cough of a cold because someone can wheeze for two reasons- the virus irritated the airway or the airway tends to irritate easily on its own.  Sneezes and coughs are more usually just due to the virus.

The reason this is important is that if the wheezing is only the fault of the virus, then it won't happen again very often, since it only occurred with that particular virus.  But if the wheezing is the result of your child's airway being easily provoked into wheezing, then those airways will tend to wheeze in a recurrent pattern, that is, over and over.

What is bronchiolitis?
Bronchiolitis is a wheezy cold seen in infants.   The cause is the same set of viruses that cause all respiratory colds and flus.  What makes it different in infancy is that the airways in their lungs are so small.   It turns out everyone's airways get inflamed when you get a cold, but our airways are so big that the swelling that happens makes us cough, but not typically wheeze.  In young infants, they can get very, very wheezy when their small airways get swollen.

Bronchiolitis is not asthma, even though both situations make you wheeze.  Asthma is a condition where your own airways have the tendency to get inflamed, and that inflammation can be triggered in all sorts of ways, including any airway virus, exercise, cold air, etc.  Asthma always recurs. Bronchiolitis usually only happens once.  Usually once you have another cold that makes your airways really inflamed you have grown out of early infancy and don't wheeze with a cold again (unless you have asthma).

So bronchiolitis is unique in two ways- unlike most colds in older kids and adults, it causes heavy wheezing in young infants.  And unlike asthma, it usually only happens once.

What to do
 Because a child with bronchiolitis and an asthma attack look very similar, for years it was thought that treatments for asthma would help babies with bronchiolitis.

This is the big news from the new recommendations, the treatments that work so well for asthma do nothing to help babies with bronchiolitis.

This means if you give an infant with bronchiolitis albuterol or steroids, nothing happens, they do not work.

The new guidelines for treatment of bronchiolitis now clearly state that albuterol and steroids should not be used.

Another, very important new point, is that a chest X-ray is not helpful, and in fact can cause harm.  The harm comes from the fact that all the airway inflammation in bronchiolitis causes wispy shadows to appear on the X-ray, leading most radiologists to make the mistake of calling it pneumonia.

So, the new guidelines now explicitly state that there is no reason obtain a chest X-ray for routine bronchiolitis, and if one  is obtained, an expert in reading infant chest X-rays needs to be involved to avoid the mistake of calling bronchiolitis pneumonia.

Finally, the new guidelines note that blood tests and cultures of the airway are not helpful.  About a third of infants with bronchiolitis have more than one virus causing the infection so testing for one will 30% of the time miss others.

The guidelines clearly state that there is on reason to obtain blood tests such as a blood count, or airway swabs for RSV, they simply do not help.

BOTTOM LINES
  1. Bronchiolitis is a very unpleasant and far too common type of viral infection of the respiratory system.   It is seen primarily in young infants since their airways are simply smaller than older children's.
  2. It is essentially a very wheezy cold in young infants.  The key symptom is wheeze, the result of swelling of the airway, increased mucus production in the airway, and muscle tightening around the small airway.
  3. Drugs that relieve the wheezing seen in asthma do not work in bronchiolitis.  New guidelines advise that we do not use albuterol or steroids for this condition anymore.
  4. Tests for blood counts and cultures for airway viruses do not help the infant and the new guidelines advise that we do not do these tests if an infant has bronchiolitis.
  5. Care must be taken in considering getting a chest X-ray, it does not help the infant with bronchiolitis to get a chest X-ray.   If there is a question, however, of whether bronchiolitis is the problem, or only problem present and a chest X-ray is obtained, care must be taken not to interpret the changes of bronchiolitis as pneumonia.
  6. Therefore, if your young infant develops a wheezy cough, we will help determine if bronchiolitis is present.  The most important question at that point will be if the degree of wheezing is actually interfering with breathing to any significant degree.  Sometimes it is not clear if the wheezing is purely from viral irritation (as in colds and bronchiolitis) or from the airway's own tendency to inflame (as in asthma).  When that is not clear, a course of albuterol can help make the distinction, as it helps with wheezing from asthma and does not from bronchiolitis.
As we enter into winter, and our children have already started having lots of colds, we stand ready to help.

Dr. Arthur Lavin


*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2014-10-27

Food Allergies: Do you have them or not?

Food Allergies:  Do You Have Them or Not?

A recent study found that there is a large difference between testing positive for a food allergy, and having one, so we thought it would be helpful to clarify, how do you know if you have a particular allergy to a food?

Let's start by making clear that food allergies are very, very real.  There is no question that lots of kids have them and that they can cause lots of trouble.

It turns out that there are essentially three types of tests available to find out if someone has an allergy to a food (or anything else).

To understand how these tests work, it will help to know a few basics about allergies.

An allergy is a reaction that happens when something you are allergic to connects with a very specific antibody, unleashing a general reaction.

To be clear on each of these elements of an allergic reaction:
  • The something you are allergic to:  This is usually a unique molecule, often a protein, in the food or thing one is allergic to.  For example, if someone is allergic to milk, they react to just one protein in the milk.  So, the whole reaction will not happen unless that protein is present.
  • A specific antibody:  Antibodies most distinctive property is that they only bind (connect) to one type of molecule.  The body can make trillions of different antibodies, but only chooses to make many thousands.  You cannot be classically allergic to something without making an antibody that attaches to that item, and only that item.
  • A general reaction:  Here is how the allergic reaction actually happens:  the thing you are allergic to connects with the specific antibody, once that happens that connection activates the antibody to turn on the allergic reaction.  No exposure to what you are allergic to, no reaction.  No specific antibody to that item, no reaction.   
So you need 4 things to happen to be have an allergic reaction to a food:
1.  You have to eat or contact the food.
2.  There has to be an antibody to that food not only present in the body, but armed and ready to ignite the reaction once the food comes by.
3.  The food molecule and antibody need to connect, that complex needs to activate the allergy reaction, and then the allergic reaction happens.

The Three Tests
So with that in mind we can understand the three test for food allergy:
  1. Blood Test
  2. Skin Test
  3. What Happens if You Eat it Test
Blood Test
This test simply measures how much specific antibody to the food in question is circulating in your blood.  This is not the same as measuring how allergic you are, since only antibody linked to particular cells that actually activate the allergic reaction are relevant.  That is, one could have enormous quantities of antibody to shrimp, for example, circulating around in your blood, but none actually connected to the cells that cause a reaction.   You could do the blood test, find a very high level of antibody, but nothing happens when you eat the shrimp.   Or the other way happens too, where there is no or little antibody circulating, but lots on the relevant cells, the blood test is negative, but every time you eat shrimp you have a big reaction.  Now, it does turn out that the more antibody to a food circulating, the more likely someone will react when they eat it; and, the less antibody present the less likely someone will react when eating the item, but not always.

Skin Test
This test actually sees if exposure to the food can create a visible allergic reaction.  The problem is that it only really tells us if scratching the food molecule into the skin will cause a reaction.  Again, it does turn out that the more skin reaction to a food being scratched into the skin, the more likely someone will react when they eat it; and, the less reaction in the skin the less likely someone will react when eating the item, but not always.

The What Happens if you Eat it Test
This is by far the most reliable of all three tests.  And for an obvious and good reason- if you eat a lot of peanuts and you experience no reactions, then either you have no antibody to peanut molecules, or the antibodies are not activated to create a reaction, you are not allergic.  And if every time you eat peanuts you develop hives, lip swelling, and wheezing, you are most definitely allergic.   This test, therefore, trumps all other tests.  For that particular meal, there is no error rate, you either react or you do not, that time.

The Study
In 2010 Dr. Liu et al (J Allerg Clin Immunol. 2010; 126(4): 798-806) found that about 17% of children in the United States have a positive blood test for allergy, but only 2.5% of children in the United States actually react when they eat any food.
Simply put, a person is nearly 7 time more likely to have a positive blood test for food allergy, than to actually have a food allergy.

What to do?
Given all the above, what's the best way to find out if your child is allergic to any particular food?
Here are some tips on how best to proceed:
  • Guage how urgent finding out is.  If your child has a very slight symptom that has only occurred once, that is clearly less urgent than if your child has trouble breathing each time something is eaten.
  • If the reaction is very mild (and the best guage on severity of reaction is the degree of trouble breathing caused by the reaction), you have the option of trying to see if the symptom goes away if your child stops eating the suspected food.  This is half of the "What Happens if You Eat It" test.    If you are very confident that the reactions you are seeing are very mild, one can try out the other half of this test, see if any reaction happens when your child eats the suspected food.   Of course, if there is no reaction on eating it, and no change in symptoms when not eating, he or she is not allergic.  And, if there are allergy symptoms when he or she eats it and those symptoms go away, there is an allergy to that food present.
  • If the reaction is not mild, then it becomes prudent to do some of the indirect tests noted above, namely skin and/or blood tests.  These tests, as noted, are not 100% predictive of food allergy, in fact the national survey quoted above suggests the blood test will overcall a food allergy diagnosis quite a bit.   But if the skin and/or blood tests are negative, it gives you a bit more ease of mind (not proof) that you can do the "What Happens If You Eat It" test, at least with less risk.
  • If the reaction is severe, that is, trouble breathing in the chest or mouth/throat, occurs, then the first step needs to be elimination of the suspected food(s) from your child's diet immediately and consultation with an allergist to sort out just what is causing the reaction.  Again, skin and blood tests will likely be used in this situation, too, and will again help point the way to a conclusion, but even here they cannot be the final word on what your child is allergic too.
Bottom Line
The question of whether your child has a food allergy always will hinge on whether they actually have an allergic reaction when they eat that food.

Skin tests and blood tests measure indicators that one may or may not be allergic, they are not proof of an actual allergy sequence being active in your child.

In the case of blood tests, nearly 7 times as many children test positive as actually react.

This makes the What Happens if I Eat it Test the most reliable way to know if your child has a food allergy to that food.   This test is safe when the reactions are very mild.

But, if there is any question of a reaction involving trouble breathing, an allergist should be consulted to sort out what is causing this level of reaction.

As always, we hope this information proves helpful.

To your health,
Dr. Arthur Lavin

*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2014-10-23

A Special Ebola Update: A Briefing by Dr. Tony Fauci set by The White House

A Special Ebola Update: 
A Briefing by Dr. Tony Fauci set up by The White House

[Updated October 23, 2014 9:00PM]

Dear Families,

At Advanced Pediatrics we have worked hard to try to keep up to date with the rapidly changing picture that the Ebola virus and its infection has been presenting to the world.  Lately, we have focused on the nature of this infection in the US.

The Briefing
Tonight, I am very honored to share with you the very latest information available in the United States on Ebola.  As a state director for Ohio in the organization, Doctors for America, I was invited this evening to be part of a special, invitation only, briefing by Dr. Anthony Fauci put together by The White House, on the state of Ebola.  No press were invited, so this information is not part of the usual news cycle.

The White House selected a small group of doctors from across the United States to help get as accurate a picture of what is happening with Ebola right now.  This posting is the first communication I have made to anyone on what I learned from Dr. Fauci.


Dr. Tony Fauci
Leading the briefing is one of the world's great minds in the area of new, deadly, viral infections.  Dr. Fauci currently serves as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the National Institute of Health charged with research and care of such diseases.  He is known across the world as one of two scientists who led the work that revealed the cause of AIDS and its nature, namely HIV.  As such, he is uniquely positioned to know in depth the details of the virus Ebola.

The briefing was moderated by Ms. Andrea Purse, The White House Director of Broadcast Media.  

I was joined by roughly 15-20 doctors, each from a state across the US, from NY to Utah.

What We were Told, What We Learned about Ebola Tonight
Here are the key points communicated to us tonight:

  • Ebola is not changing its nature much despite many mutations.  Dr. Fauci did note that the Ebola virus is a type of virus in which the genes change rapidly as it transmits across a population, but the vast, vast majority of these changes in its genes, have no impact on it actual nature or function.   These sorts of virus change their genes frequently, but do not really change their behavior much over time.
  • How it spreads remains very stable and unchanging.  An enduring feature of the Ebola virus spreading is that all strains studied need direct contact.  None of them have developed the ability to survive being dried out and spreading across the air for any large distance.  The virus must remain in a wet state, hence the repeated references to bodily fluids.  It is most concentrated in sweat and blood.  Sneezing and coughing can produce wet particles that can travel several feet and create direct contact.  So for example, if someone with Ebola coughed, in particular if they had bloody sputum, wet droplets landing on an uninfected person who then wiped their eyes while the droplets were wet, could catch Ebola.  But if that person coughed and the droplets in their cough dried out before landing on someone else, which is what typically happens with sneezes and coughs, then it will not spread.   Dr. Fauci noted that across the whole history of viruses, none that required direct wet contact have ever mutated into one that could be spread by dried out airborne transmission.
  • There is no American outbreak now, nor is there likely to be one.  A total of two people to date have caught Ebola in the United States and not one of their contacts so far have caught it from them.  Therefore, the only instance of Ebola spreading, in the United States, is in the very unusual setting of being a health care worker exposed during care of a sick patient in protocols that are no longer current.
  • A note on how the two nurses in Dallas got Ebola.  Dr. Fauci is also the doctor caring for the nurse from Dallas now in an NIH hospital in Washington.  He shared his impressions after having had the chance to talk with her about her exposure.  It turns out that when she was caring for the patient with Ebola in Dallas, the protocols in place were developed in Africa, for exposures limited to care such as IV placement in a relatively informal quonset hut like setting.  These protocols contained over 20 Ebola outbreaks in Africa in such settings.   But in the ICU setting in the US, so much more can be done, including intubation, deep central IV lines, etc.  This leads to a far more intense level of exposure to far more bodily fluids, and the old protocols did not protect against that.  These protocols are now updated which will protect health care workers much better.  But the main point here is that the Ebola case caught in the US, are limited to only 2 cases, to situations that no longer exist:  health care workers intensely exposed in an ICU setting without the new protocols for ICU exposures in place.
  • The status of the Ebola vaccine.  There are two vaccine trials in place.  Each use a harmless virus as a transport virus to deliver the not infectious Ebola fragment to the immune system- thereby creating safe immunity to Ebola virus infection.  Both have worked in monkeys.  One is being tested in humans now and as of Sept. 22, has not shown any harm to people.  By sometime in November, results should be known of how well it protects people.  The plan, if the results look good, is to have a many thousand person trial in West Africa launched by the end of November.  If that goes well and no bad reactions are found, a vaccine for Ebola that can stop this illness may be in hand.
  • Our current US Strategies.  The key challenges are threefold:
    • Identify all those infected
    • Transport without spread to qualified facilities
    • Care for those with Ebola infection
           The US plan is to have every hospital in the country able to identify anyone who comes to their facility who has an Ebola infection.

There are currently 3 hospitals in the US, per Dr. Fauci, that are fully ready to care for anyone with an Ebola infection:  one in Nebraska, the NIH hospital in Washington, DC, and the Emory Hospital with the CDC in Atlanta.

Plans are to focus actual care of those infected in these three hospitals, but to develop a small network of hospitals with various levels of expertise in a tiered system providing care across a range of regions.

  • The current Ebola strains seem to affect children less than adults.
  • What about travel bans?  Many people wonder, why not simply keep everyone from the most concentrated areas of infection, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea out of the US.  It turns out a complete travel ban may have a paradoxical effect.   Right now, the US has a policy that travelers from these 3 countries can only enter the US via two airports in NYC, and one at Dulles, Atlanta, and Chicago.  Anyone from these 3 countries must go through an intensive Ebola screening process before they enter the US.  About 96% of travelers from these three countries entered the US via one of these five countries before the policy was in place that all had to. Now 100% do and they all undergo the Ebola screen.  If a ban were imposed, we would not know where they are coming from, their travel will then go undetected, perhaps via another country and go anywhere into the US.  Further, the only real hope of eliminating the chance of a US outbreak is to eliminate the outbreak in W Africa.  A travel ban would not only be cruel and deliver a signal that the US shuns them, but such a signal could lead to a collapse in efforts to contain and conquer this outbreak in W Africa, leading to an explosive spread across their borders.
  • What are the key misunderstandings?  The #1 key misunderstanding is that impression that some mis-steps constitute an actual outbreak.  There is no Ebola outbreak in the United States at this time.  Dr. Fauci anticipates a small number of people with Ebola will continue to get through even the best policy to limit US exposure [one man in NYC may be such a case, he came in from Liberia], but seriously doubts that number will rise beyond a handful of people, particularly if efforts to reverse the outbreak in W Africa succeed.   But he does recognize that having some cases come into the US, a hospital missing the diagnosis, 2 nurses getting Ebola, all erode trust, and raise worry.  But that worry must be put to good use, to learn about how Ebola really acts, to support good science and its principles in winning the fight against Ebola.  Dr. Fauci sees no benefit in reacting purely out of fear.  Diverting planes, closing businesses when there is little reason to believe anyone could catch Ebola on these planes or in these businesses only raises fear, and does not reduce the spread of the virus.

Bottom Line

  • Ebola is a dangerous virus that will require great human ingenuity to contain and, ultimately eradicate.
  • At this moment, there is no Ebola virus epidemic in the United States.  The total number of people who we know have been infected with Ebola in the US is 2. 
  • A key feature of the Ebola virus spreading is that all strains studied need direct contact.  None of them have developed the ability to survive being dried out and spreading across the air for any large distance.  The virus must remain in a wet state, hence the repeated references to bodily fluids. 
  • There is good hope for an effective vaccine. This along with a worldwide effort in West Africa establishes a good reason to believe that human ingenuity will indeed defeat this virus.
  • It is critical that efforts to eradicate Ebola infection in West Africa prevail, that careful care of the small number of infections that will appear in the US and other countries is very doable, and is being done.
  • Ebola demands our respect and care.  But a very thoughtful response is rapidly coming into place.  We have every reason to not only hope, but expect this infection will not pose danger to us here in the US, and that the world can defeat it in West Africa.

We will of course continue to keep you as informed as we can be.


To your health,
Dr. Lavin



*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

Good Rx- a great app

A New App to Help you Find the Right Price-
For Prescriptions

UPDATE 1/29/15

I wrote this note some months ago, and just today, Good Rx let me know that 7 patients in the practice have used it and saved a total of $980.68!  (NOTE:  I have NO relationship with Good Rx, I do not collect any fees from them, or the drug stores.  I only recommend it as a fellow consumer and advocate for your family).

Take a look at GoodRx

It's an app that will, based on your location, and the medication your are buying, lists the cost of your prescription at area pharmacies, and available coupons.

Some of the ranges can be quite dramatic- one place may tell you that it will cost you $100 and another, with coupon, $30, for example.

Once you locate the best price, many pharmacies will then price match.

So take a look, see if it helps.


Dr. Lavin


*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

What is a Virus?

What is a Virus?

In the last few months, three viruses have gripped our attention.  The influenza virus because of a few weeks of possible flu immunization shortage, the emergence of the Enterovirus D68 a summertime virus that turned into a real attack on the breathing system, and of course, the Ebola virus.

And, of course, we all know about colds.  Everyone gets them, they cause so much agony, and they are so common.

All these, and many other infections are caused by a very peculiar type of life, the virus.  So we thought it might be interesting to present in a little more detail what is a virus.

The Basics- what's in a virus, how do they work?
Viruses are the simplest and one of the oldest forms of life.  Other forms of life include the bacteria, the yeasts and fungi, the animals, and the plants.  All these forms of life consist of either single cells (bacteria, yeast), or groups of cells (fungi, animals, and plants).  But not viruses.  Viruses are the only type of life that has no cell.  Because they are not cells, some even wonder if they are really alive.

But all agree that viruses can reproduce and adapt, so by that skill many consider them very much alive.

Viruses are also a very old form.  They are at least several billions year old.  Compare that to the current human line, which at most is  150 thousand years old.  No comparison.

Viruses do reproduce and change, but can only do so using some other form of life's cells.  No cells, no viruses.  Without their own cells, how do they reproduce and evolve?

The answer is very interesting.  They are actually packages of information.  Every virus has a bit of genetic material (DNA or RNA) inside, wrapped in a protein coat.

The protein coat picks the lock to the cell that virus can infect.  Once inside, the protein coat then delivers its inner contents, the genetic core, to the cell's genes.  There the virus takes over the cell's machinery and forces it to spin out a huge number of copies of the viral genes and their protein coats. In this way, one virus in one cell can lead to the creation of a staggering number of new viruses, ready to repeat the cycle over again.

Why Viruses are Often so Specific to One Type of Life
So this means that to live, a virus has to find a way into a cell, and a way to go from cell to cell.  This is no mean feat, in fact it is astounding.  It is so challenging, that with few exceptions, every virus can only get into the cells of one species.

The cold virus for a chicken can only give chickens colds.  Measles virus can only give humans measles.  Other viruses can only infect certain bacteria, others only one species of plant, and so forth.

There are also viruses that have figured out how to crack the code of various species, usually on type of life.  So there are viruses that can infect several animals.  But there are few, if any, that can infect various animals and plants.

Perhaps the most prolific virus is the influenza virus which infects nearly all humans during the winter, but only infects animals in the spring and summer- usually barnyard animals and birds.

How do Viruses Make us Ill?
The answer to this question has two answers:
1.  Viruses destroy cells
2.  Viruses change the function of cells

In many of the most common and mild viral illnesses, like colds and flus, viruses actually destroy the cell they use to reproduce.  Remember that the way all viruses work is that their genetic material takes over the host cell gene machine and forces it to make copies of the viral genes, to make more viruses.   If in that process a zillion viruses are copied, the cell often pops from the expansion, and dies, releasing the zillions of viruses.  This kills the cell.   If enough cells die, then a patch of tissue is left destroyed and inflamed.  This is what happens to your nose when you get a cold.  It really is very much like a mild burn, the lining of the nose gets destroyed by viruses popping sheets of cells.
Any viral infection like this makes us ill by literally burning away a sheet of cells, causing pain, inflammation (this is where fever comes from), and lost of fluid leaks (runny nose, vomiting, diarrhea, for example)

Sometimes, though, the cell is not exploded from rampant viral copying.  In these situations, the virus still takes over the cell's gene machine, but the virus has it create an ongoing production line of viruses, not enough to pop the cell, so the cell continues to live, but it stops working normally.  The most famous example of such an infection is AIDS, where the cells of the immune system are infected but not destroyed.   In many ways, we are better off with viruses that kill cells, especially if they are superficial cells, for then the body makes new, healthy cells to replace the dead ones.  But if the cell lives and lives well enough, it will continue to work (even if abnormally) and this can cause much and long-lasting dysfunction and trouble, as in AIDS.

And then, some viruses can lie dormant for years.  They insert there genes into the host cell and then just sit there and do nothing.  In this situation the person is not ill, but if the virus kicks on and starts making tons of copies at some point, an illness could erupt.  This is the story of chickenpox and shingles, where once the chickenpox illness is over, the same virus just sits dormant in the cells near the spinal cord.   Every now and then they reactivate, travel down the nerve to the skin and this is shingles.

How do we Recover from a Viral Illness?
The only way our body can recover from a viral illness is to kill every cell that is actively infected with a virus.  We can't actually kill a virus since on its own it is hardly alive.  But if our body kills every cell that contains a certain virus, then that virus will be cleared from our body.  This strategy works only if the body can identify every cell containing that virus and kills all of them.
And, this is exactly what happens in colds and flus.  Our body goes after every infected cell, and the infection and virus is completely eliminated, new cells are made to take the place of those destroyed by the virus, and we heal.
If our body cannot do this, the viral infection becomes chronic, like AIDS, and many hepatitis viral infections.
And, in the case of dormant viruses, the body leaves these alone, the cells that contain the virus look no different from normal cells because the virus is not doing anything, so the infection is lifelong, but dormant, like dormant chickenpox that simply sits there unless a shingles flare occurs.

How do We Treat Viruses?
A handful of viruses can be cured by treatment with anti-viral drugs, viral antibiotics.
These include influenza, hepatitis C, and some herpes viruses such as CMV and herpes simplex.
In each of these examples, the drugs do help, but are not 100% effective.

But, for nearly all other viruses, there are simply no drugs that actually kill the virus, speed up the healing from all the havoc they cause, or even end the symptoms they create.  This is most vividly experienced with common colds and stomach flus, where drug stores have shelves bursting with products promising an end to runny noses and coughs, or diarrhea, but always fail to deliver.  At this time about 500 drugs promising relief from viral symptoms are under investigation by the FDA for false claims. Five hundred such drugs under investigation!

Two viral symptoms that can be treated by drugs are fever and pain, and we recommend ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) over acetaminophen (Tylenol) due to questions about whether acetaminophen may boost the development of asthma.

How do we Prevent Viral Infections?
We are all strongly drawn to the idea that if we simply take this or that action, we can stop the spread of viruses through a classroom, school, or home.  The evidence, however, is overwhelming that viruses travel from person-to-person astounding well, despite kids being kept home when ill, despite hand-washing, despite nearly any effort.  Just looking at the sweeping waves of viral infections that cover continents in a matter of days dramatizes the fact that trying to stop a virus from spreading, especially common, very contagious ones, is like trying to stop the wind.

Given that very few viruses can be treated, and none of the very contagious ones can be stopped from spreading, that leaves us with only one control measure that has had any real impact- immunizations.

The body has figured out how to protect itself in one of the great triumphs of clever evolution, one we recover from a virus, it is almost always the case we cannot get it again.  If you get measles, you never get it again.  If you get cold variety #281, you never can get sick from cold #281 again (of course, you can still get cold #282).

This very natural, very important key to our survival is the whole basis of the idea of immunization.  If you can't get a viral illness twice, why not deliver a very mild case of that illness, so when the real thing comes along, you can no longer get it.

Do immunizations work?  Just take a look around.  Smallpox in the 20th century killed 500 million people, more than World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, and all other wars in that century, combined.   But because of immunization, and only by this strategy, smallpox is now eliminated from the planet.  It worked.

And, it has worked in every case- measles, mumps, rubella, even chickenpox, hepatitis B, polio, all are sharply reduced.  In areas where immunizations are used by nearly everyone, these diseases are essentially eliminated.


Bottom Lines
1.  Viruses are curious packages of genes wrapped in proteins.  The proteins gain access to the target cell, the genes make the cell make more viruses.
2.  In destroying the cell, the virus causes the illness.  When sheets of cells are destroyed, the illness is where the irritation takes place- runny nose in the nose, sore throat in the throat, cough in the lung, diarrhea in the gut.
3.  Only a small number of viruses can be killed by a medication, almost none of their symptoms can be relieved by medication.
4.  It is next to impossible to stop the spread of a very contagious virus.  Some viruses are quite rare and do not spread well, and these are the very, very rare examples of viral infections that can be controlled by containment (e.g., SARS, Ebola).
5.  The only action that has ever really spared us from the diseases caused by viruses has been immunization, which has had a spectacular and dramatic record of success.


To you health,
Dr. Lavin




*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.