2013-08-19

Dr. Lavin Publishes a Letter in The New York Times

English: Book 1, page 1, of De Rerum Natura by...
English: Book 1, page 1, of De Rerum Natura by Titus Lucretius Carus, from the 1675 edition by Tanaquil Faber (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Dr. Lavin Publishes a Letter in 
The New York Times

On August 13, 2013, The New York Times published a letter to the Editor by Dr. Arthur Lavin on a topic of science.

Here is the link:

The letter was in response to an article in the Science Times about the notion that everything in the universe is made out of the same stuff- atoms.  That is, the atoms in stars, in trees, in rivers, in Saturn's rings, in birds, and in us, are exactly the same material.

The Times article noted that the first person to make such a claim made it in 1929.

My letter noted that this notion, that we are all made of the same stuff, actually goes back over 2,400 years to the Greek philosopher Epicurus, who developed the original notion of atoms made by Democritus over 2,500 years ago.   The notion that stars, tables, and humans are all made of exactly the same material was deeply offensive to many religions early in their history, leading to a vilification of Epicurus.
That is why we tend to think of his thinking as simply promoting a life of pleasure, hence the phrase Epicurean.   But Epicurus was not a hedonist, he was a very thoughtful philosopher whose core thought was indeed that we are all made out of atoms, that the atoms themselves are forever.  But they tend to aggregate into various forms that are temporary.  Some of these forms work well, some do not.  Those that work well continue, and so he was the first person to write about natural selection and evolution.   He did speak about pleasure, but his thought was that it is so extraordinary that of all ways atoms could combine, some form living beings, and against all odds, some form each of us.  The moral of his view of things was that to be alive is so extraordinary, that each of us should be profoundly grateful to be alive and take pleasure in this tremendous gift.  This was the pleasure he promoted, not hedonism.

Epicurus' philosophy was expressed in a magnificent poem by the Roman Lucretius about 2100 years ago, in a piece called De Rerum Natura.   The reaction to Epicurus philosophy was so extreme that nearly every copy of this masterpiece was destroyed.   For over a thousand years it was forgotten, until its rediscovery in a remote German monastery by a great Italian bibliophile in the 1400's.   The rediscovery of this poem inspired thinkers across Europe, and revived the notion that we are of the same stuff as all else.  Many credit the power of this idea coming back into European minds as a great source of the power of the Renaissance.  We know, for example the poem had a great impact on Galileo and helped propel him towards his discoveries, which in turn created the foundation for modern science.

Lately science has gotten a bad rap.  Certain products of science pose great risks to us, including military technology, nuclear reactors.  Others cause great worry such as genetically altered foods.  And science seems behind the relentless creation of products that continue to be hawked such as prescription drugs.

But science is also the entire basis of all the extraordinary benefits of modern life.  We now live over twice as long as people did, as recently as 1900.   Our children now live to adulthood nearly free of the once nearly universal threat of disease.   Food is more abundant than ever in history.  We live in clean homes that are adjusted to stay at a comfortable temperature the year round.  And the explosion of information and innovation allows me to write this essay and have it available to everyone in the world with the stroke of one button.

So, enjoy the brief letter.  It is a reminder that science was not always allowed to flourish in human societies.  I do think we live in an era where science is vulnerable.  Let the story of Epicurus and Lucretius remind us that we can only count on science continuing to help us live well if we defend the very idea of science.

My best,
Dr. Arthur Lavin

Reference
All the information regarding Epicurus and Lucretius in this essay is credited to Stephen Greenblatt and his book The Swerve.  This is perhaps one of the most interesting and powerful books about science and humanity I have read.



*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.
Enhanced by Zemanta

2013-07-21

Time to put the Vitamins Away

Time to put the Vitamins Away

Over the years, many of you have heard me talk about how needless it is to give your children "vitamins."

The evidence for their benefit has never been found, and many studies have actually found them to cause some harm.   

But a recent essay by Dr. Paul Offit gathers the evidence together better than any piece I have seen, and simply stated, makes it clear that no one should be taking multivitamins, they do no good, and they indeed cause grave harm.


Dr. Offit is one of our nation's most thoughtful pediatric infectious disease experts.  A true scholar, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, he has devoted much of his career to sorting out fact from fiction in our wild medical marketplace.    Most recently he has published a book reviewing 51,000 claims of cures called Do You Believe in Magic (Harper, June 2013).  He finds that only 4 of the 51,000 claims have any proof behind them.

But in this essay he traces the history of how we came to be a nation where about half of the country takes a vitamin pill every day.  He then reviews all the published studies on whether taking such pills work.  And then he looks at whether they cause any harm.

It turns out that any of us who take a vitamin owe our interest in doing so to one man, Dr. Linus Pauling.  Linus Pauling is one of the most brilliant scientists of the 20th century.  A towering genius in the field of chemistry, he is responsible for our very understanding of how molecules form.   But in the last phase of his career he made a speculation that turned out to be untrue, but still lives on in our imagination- that if you eat a huge amount of vitamins, you will be healthier.  His claim was actually that if you eat enough vitamin pills, you will never get a cold, or cancer, or maybe even heart disease.


But take a look at the evidence, which is deep, abundant, and rich.


VITAMINS OFFER NO BENEFIT (except folic acid)
Studies have spanned over the decades and enrolled vast numbers of people.  In every instance, the evidence points to taking vitamin pills as being no more helpful than a cup of water.   Taking vitamins has no impact at all on how many colds you will get, how severe the colds will be, how long they will last.
Taking vitamins will not prevent one case of cancer, or one event of heart disease, or any other illness or condition.

The only exception proven to date is that taking extra folic acid will prevent the development of spina bifida, meaning women should take folic acid (400 mcg a day) from their first to their last period.

VITAMINS DO CAUSE HARM
Those who have followed the vitamin story should not be surprised to find that taking a multivitamin is a waste of time.  It offers no benefit.  But the evidence for the harm they do is deeply disturbing and perhaps surprising.

In nearly every study, the group that took multivitamins did not live as long as those that did not.
How so?  Mainly due to increased chances of getting cancer or having a heart attack.  The numbers are not tiny.  One study cited looked at 18,000 people from Seattle and found if you took multivitamins your chance of getting cancer went up 28% and your chance of heart disease went up 17%, compared to people who didn't take multivitamins!

Another study found that men who take multivitamins double their risk of developing prostrate cancer.

Linus Pauling himself died of prostrate cancer.



BOTTOM LINE:
It is time to stop giving our children multivitamins.  
They do no good.
They do cause harm.
Time to stop.

Read the article, and let your friends know about it, too.

To your health,
Dr. Arthur Lavin



*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.
Enhanced by Zemanta

2013-06-24

The Current situation with the Rotavirus Vaccine- The Advanced Pediatrics Perspective

The Current situation with the Rotavirus Vaccine:
Not a very dangerous illness
Norovirus is taking the place of Rotavirus
Vaccine carries some risk


Rotavirus was the #1 cause of stomach flu in the United States prior to the introduction of a vaccine to prevent this infection in 2007.  Prior to the development of the vaccine for rotavirus, this virus would sweep across our region every year sometime in February and disappear sometime in the summer.

Rotavirus infection is no fun, it causes vomiting, diarrhea, and stomach upset.  It is the stomach flu that almost everyone has experienced, unpleasant, uncomfortable.  The vomiting and diarrhea can lead to enough loss of fluid to require IV hydration.  For most children, the rotavirus stomach flu is unpleasant, but fluids can be given at home and no need for an IV develops.  For some, IV fluid is needed, and for a very few, enough IV fluid is needed that a brief stay in the hospital occurs.

More rarely, rotavirus infection can cause the intestine to telescope.  Think of the intestine as a long tube and imagine one segment sliding over the next segment, like a telescope can do.   When that happens the gut gets very swollen and can even become blocked or act blocked.  That situation goes by the difficult to spell and pronounce name of intussusception.   

In our own experience with rotavirus, we have been able to monitor the impact of this infection in families who come to Advanced Pediatrics over the last 10 years.  During this period the vast majority of children in the practice have experienced rotavirus stomach flu, and many dozen have had to go to the ER for IV fluids to be given over a several hour period.  Less than a dozen have needed IV fluid for long enough to require a day or so in the hospital, and even fewer have developed intussusception.  During this time period, essentially single child in the practice who has had a stomach flu infection has had a full, complete, and uncomplicated recovery- to the best of our knowledge.

So, given this experience, we have studied whether offering rotavirus vaccination would be, overall, a benefit to the families at Advanced Pediatrics.

There are three reasons why it might not offer much benefit:
1.  The actual infection the vaccine is trying to prevent is too minor to detect much benefit.
2.  The vaccine may carry side effects that make the situation worse.
3.  Eliminating rotavirus may become irrelevant if another stomach flu virus takes its place.

The first rotavirus vaccine came out in the 1990's, and our first response was that the actual experience of stomach flu was to mild that even if the vaccine had very rare but serious side effects, a child was better off not getting it, so we held off recommending its use.  Not long after it was found that that first version of the rotavirus vaccine indeed caused a jump in the chance of the child's bowel obstructing via the condition of intussusception, described above.   That vaccine was taken off the market.

In 2007, a second version of the rotavirus vaccine was introduced.  At Advanced Pediatrics we came to our earlier conclusion.  Namely, since no child in the practice with stomach flu had ever suffered a serious consequence, it made sense to be sure that this new version of a vaccine be observed, to make sure it too did not turn out to be harmful enough to be taken off the market.

Fortunately, this time, the vaccine did not cause enough of an increase in the rates of intussusception to be taken off the market, and no other serious side effects have emerged over the last 6 years.

This month, June of 2013, a major paper on the chance of developing intussusception after use of this and a third and newest rotavirus vaccine was published.   Together with other studies, we now have a clearer picture of whether getting the rotavirus vaccine raises risk or lowers it, and if the lower risk is sufficient to justify its use.

What the studies have found is that for infant ages 8-11 weeks, which is the age the first dose of rotavirus vaccine is to be given, the chance of intussusception does increase over the chance of getting it if you are not vaccinated.  The chances are remote in either case, the rates are per 100,000 infants.  But if you are not vaccinated the chance of being admitted to a hospital for intussusception is about 7 per 100,000 infants, and if you are vaccinated the risk goes up to 11.5.

So the risk of intussusception is increased if you get the rotavirus vaccine, not by much, but by some.

A second trend has also emerged, and that is the appearance of the norovirus.  Noroviruses are famous as the cause of cruise-ship stomach flu epidemics, but they are also the #1 cause of food related illness with an incubation period of about 12 hours.  

About 85% of American infants have become vaccinated for rotavirus, but norovirus has stepped into the gap and now causes more stomach flu than any other virus.  In fact, there is so much norovirus around that even if you are vaccinated for rotavirus, you are just about as likely to get stomach flu.  The drop in rotavirus stomach flu has been matched by the rise in norovirus stomach flu.

BOTTOM LINE
Putting it all together the case for using the rotavirus vaccine seems quite weak:

Our experience with stomach flu is reassuring
No lasting harm from a case of stomach flu has occurred

Norovirus has replaced rotavirus
Giving the rotavirus vaccine will have little impact on the chance of your child getting stomach flu.

Intussusception risk
A large body of data from the last 6 years establishes that getting the rotavirus vaccine increases the chance that your child will develop intussusception- a process that can cause bowel obstruction.

Not much protection from getting stomach flu and an increased risk of a serious complication combine to lead us to continue recommend against the routine use of rotavirus immunization at Advanced Pediatrics.   The American Academy of Pediatrics and Centers for Disease Control both do recommend universal use of rotavirus vaccine in early infancy, and so we do make the vaccine available, and remain happy to discuss the topic.



*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

A Moment to Mark an Important Success;; The HPV Vaccine

A Moment to Mark an Important Success:
The HPV Vaccine

A recent report has proven that the use of the HPV vaccine in the United States has cut the chance of a 14-19 year old young woman being infected with key HPV strains in more than half.

Since 2006, the chance of a 14-19 year old young woman being infected with key HPV straind dropped 56%!

That is a very dramatic success, and occurs even with the rate of immunization for HPV not reaching 100%.

The trend suggests that if everyone got the HPV immunization, the chance of being infected with strains of HPV most likely to cause cervical cancer would dramatically disappear.

Why is this so  exciting?

Because the 4 strains in the HPV vaccine account for the vast majority of cases of cervical cancer.  We now have facts on the ground establishing that the HPV immunization program could nearly eliminate the chance of a woman experiencing cervical cancer, and sharply reducing the chance she could experience the terrible experience of a questionable Pap smear.

When the HPV vaccine was first introduced we raised questions about how well would it work.  How long would it last after the 3 shot series was concluded?  Was there enough cervical tissue abnormality in the US to see a benefit from less HPV infections?

Well, now we have some real world answers.  The 3 shot series works, and works well, and lasts.  It works so well we can now be confident that getting the HPV series will change the lives of a large number of women, nearly eliminating cervical cancer and the risk of such.

Bottom Line
This report moves Advanced Pediatrics towards enthusiastically recommending that all girls and boys receive the 3-shot HPV immunization series in late middle school or early high school.

Dr. Arthur Lavin



*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2013-05-07

SPRING ALLERGIES!

SPRING ALLERGIES!

Right now our community is experiencing a fierce burst of allergies, so it makes sense to go over what this is, and what can be done.

Why such a rough year?   I believe it is because an unusually cold spring kept the grass and trees (see below) from blooming for many weeks, leading to a supercharged, nearly instant, explosive amount of blooming.  A very unusual phenomenon that has, locally, created such a pulse of pollen that it is overwhelming therapies.

What are allergies?
The word allergy is derived from the Greek words for other and energy, and so it literally means energy from otherness.

What it really means is that something that is not you, from outside your body, gets your immune system to react in certain particular ways that we call allergies.

At its heart, an allergy occurs when your body develops an antibody to a particular molecule, and everytime your body contacts that molecule, the immune system attacks, causing inflammation.

There are three key differences between the inflammation caused by allergic reaction and other inflammations (like infections, auto-immune disorders), and the are:

1.  The inflammation in allergies itches
2.  The inflammation in allergies does not tend to cause severe pain.
3.  The inflammation in allergies causes very little damage.

On this last point consider the inflammation seen in untreated bacterial pneumonia or arthritis- one actually can destroy the lungs and the other, the joints.  Allergic reactions tend not to destroy tissue or organs, once the allergic reaction passes, your body returns to very much how it was before the allergic inflammation.

The inflammation of allergies is so distinctive, in these three ways, because there is a special class of antibodies that cause it, the E-class.  Infections are dealt with by M and G type of antibodies, only the E type of antibody, or Immunoglobulin E, or IgE, cause true allergies.

And so, one cannot be allergic to something unless you make IgE to that particular thing.

Spring Allergies
The allergies that are afflicting Ohio now are all due to the E-class of antibody, or IgE, to pollen.

If you are having itchy eyes, sneezy nose, cough, from allergies and it just hit the last week or so, you are allergic to pollen, via having the antibody (E-class) to pollen.

Pollen is the grain that holds the sperm of plants and some plants need to make zillions of such grains to get their seeds fertilized, or pollinated.

All the misery of this time is due to two types of pollen- tree and grass.  Not so much flowers.  Why? Because garden flowers simply do not pump the volumes of pollen into the air that grass and trees do.

So these spring allergies are due to pollen in the air, and so, the areas of the body that react and get inflamed (and miserable) are the parts the pollen hits- eyes, nose, throat, and lungs.

In each instance, the story of cause and effect is the same, pollen hits the body, the body, if it has the right IgE antibody to that pollen, reacts with itchy inflammation- including swelling, redness, itch, and fluid

Let's see how it shakes out then at each site:

Eyes
The pollen hits the eyes, and if your allergic to it, the eyes get red, intensely itchy, swollen, and fluid (mucus) accumulates.  If you lie down overnight, the swelling and mucus can combine to cause the eyes to swell shut and be matted with dried, caked mucus.  When all is said and done, though, the eyes return to normal, there is no change in vision, no harm done, only intense suffering during the period of inflammation.

Nose
The pollen hits the nose, and if your allergic to it, the nose get red, intensely itchy, swollen, and fluid (mucus) accumulates.  If you lie down overnight, the swelling and mucus can combine to cause the nose to swell  and be matted with dried, caked mucus.  When all is said and done, though, the nose returns to normal, there is no change in smell, no harm done, only intense suffering during the period of inflammation.

Throat
The pollen hits the throat,  and if your allergic to it, the throat gets red, intensely itchy and sore, swollen, and fluid (mucus) accumulates.   When all is said and done, though, the throat returns to normal, only intense suffering during the period of inflammation.

LungsThe pollen is breathed in to the lungs, and if your allergic to it, the lungs get red, intensely itchy, swollen, and fluid (mucus) accumulates- causing the main experience of lung allergies:  cough and wheezing.
When all is said and done, though, the lungs return to normal, there is no change in breathing, no harm done, only intense suffering during the period of inflammation.

No Anaphylaxis
Although reported, the very dangerous reactions seen to some drugs and foods where breathing actually is compromised and blood pressure drops, known as anaphylaxis, is very, very rare in spring allergies to pollen.  Another reason to know the terrible allergies being seen now are miserable, but not dangerous.

What to Do?

There are basically three therapies that help control allergies:
  • Antihistamines and other blockers- These drugs block key sequences in the chemical pathways that cause the itchy inflammation to occur.  Good blocking means no reaction, no suffering, problems controlled.
  • Steroids- These drugs kill the cells of the immune system that cause all inflammation, including allergic inflammation.  When these drugs work allergy symptoms tend to improve since the cells making the reaction happen are wiped out.
  • Allergy Shots- This technique creates a different class of antibody to the thing you are allergic to, so when that thing comes in contact with you, there will be no reaction.
Antihistamines and other blockers
One of the key tools in finding relief from all the swelling, itch, and fluid of allergies are antihistamines.
There are basically four oral forms and several eye forms available, and they are available to everyone since they are all over-the-counter and so safe even young infants can use them safely.
All four are truly very safe medications, the only significant side effect seen is sleepiness, and three of the four are formulated to make that uncommon.
It turns out everyone is different when it comes to which work.  For some, this one works and that one does not, so it is best to try one, if it doesn't help, try the other.
Here are the four:

  • Loratidine or Claritin- each dose (ranges 5-10 mg) lasts 24 hour, less drowsy
  • Cetirizine or Zyrtec- each dose  (ranges 5-10 mg) lasts 24 hour, less drowsy
  • Fexofenadine or Allegra- each dose  (ranges 60-180 mg) lasts 24 hour, less drowsy
  • Diphenhydramine or Benadryl- each dose (ranges 6.25-25 mg) lasts 4 hours, more drowsy
People tend to try the three non-drowsy, once a day preparations first, but keep in mind that diphenhydramine is the most powerful of the four, so if the allergies are very irritating, some drowsiness may be worth the relief diphenhydramine can sometimes deliver.

EYE ANTIHISTAMINES are a powerful and wonderful therapy.
They come in over-the-counter brands and prescription brands.  Potency in OTC and prescription brands is comparable, but changing the brand when one does not works makes good sense.

One more blocking drug to mention is Singulair, which has very few side effects, does not cause drowsiness, and is taken once a day.  It blocks another chemical in the allergy chemistry, and can work very well, too.

Steroids
There are many types of steroids, the ones used for allergies are technically the glucocorticoid steroids, not the ones used in sports.  As noted these steroids kill the cells that orchestrate the whole allergy cycle, so they work better than anything.

One problem- steroids have an encyclopedia of very serious side effects.
The solution- use the topically.  Essentially all of the hazards of steroid use can be avoided with the topical strategy for two reasons- the amount needed is a small fraction of that needed in oral treatments, and the drug is being applied to the inflamed area directly, allowing for a much smaller dose to still have a big impact.

The most familiar example of topical steroid use is steroid cream for eczema.  Rub a little hydrocortisone cream on a patch of eczema and the inflammation clears, with very little hazard.

There are two topical strategies of steroid use in spring allergies: the nose and the lung.

The nasal steroid systems are essentially nose sprays that deposit a small amount of steroid on the lining of the nose.   There are many, many brands of these sprays, and they all work about equally well.  There is not much point in switching brands except for price.

The lung steroid systems are inhaled steroids and they are delivered by a hand-held inhaler or a mist making machine called a nebulizer.  Again, the brands work about equally well, only price should cause a change in brand.

Both the nasal and inhaled steroids work well and are very safe.

There are oral steroids too, Prednisone and Prednisolone, but this strategy requires a much, much larger dose of steroid use and it being delivered to the entire body.  This is a far riskier move, and we typically reserve its use for more serious conditions such as life-threatening allergic reactions and severe breathing distress from severe asthma attacks.   We do not recommend the use of oral steroids in the routine of treatments for spring allergies.

Allergy Shots
Allergy shots create antibodies to the pollen that block future allergic reactions.  When they work, you are left no longer allergic to the pollen your treatment targeted.
The problem with allergy shots is that it requires a weekly injection, sometimes for years.  The benefit can take quite a long time to realize.
We recommend trying all the available antihistamines and topical steroid treatments first.
These treatments work well for most people, spring allergies tend to be well-controlled by them, and treatments with them are painless, do not require a doctor's visit every week, and give relief nearly immediately.


BOTTOM LINE
This year we are seeing a true explosion of spring allergies.  Here are some key points to remember:
  1. This is an unusually severe year of allergy.   Don't make long-term treatment plans based on the severity of this year's reactions.
  2. Spring allergies are the result of an allergy to pollen, mainly the pollen from grass and trees, not flowers.   There is no need to go searching for what your child is allergic to if their symptoms are itchy eyes and runny nose without fever in the spring during peak blossom times- the cause is pollen allergy.
  3. Treatments include oral antihistamine for all allergic symptoms, and:
    1. Eye antihistamines for inflamed eyes
    2. Nasal steroids for inflamed nose
    3. Inhaled steroids for inflamed lungs
  4. Spring allergies are harmless- they cause great agonies, but no harm.  And they are very temporary, passing as the blooming intervals pass.  And they are very treatable.  
So no need for panic.  The cause is easy to describe, the treatments are readily at hand, and the outcome is outstanding.

Here is to an enjoyable Spring for us all.

Dr. Lavin



*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2013-04-24

The Prescription Drug Epidemic- Important Points to Teach Your Kids

Ritalin

The Prescription Drug Epidemic- 
Important Points to Teach Your Kids

It even sounds strange to say it, "prescription," "drug," and "epidemic"  all in one phrase.

But here we are, a study of nearly 4,000 teens just published demonstrates that the abuse of prescription drugs in the US in teens, had popped up 33%.

About 1 in 4 US teens have abused a prescription drug at least once in the last year!


What is prescription drug abuse?  It's taking a drug that requires a prescription, without a prescription.

This is actually an extremely dangerous category of drug abuse, since it opens the door to use of drugs that, in the right combination,will kill you.

The reason the abuse of prescription drugs is so deadly is that they are designed to pack a punch, and if the punch is not delivered carefully or mixed with other punches, you can come to grief.

Very recently, we were deeply shocked to find that about 6 kids who had graduated from Orange High School not long ago died of use of prescription drugs.  Some died from taking too many, some died from mixing the wrong mix, none intended to die to the best of our knowledge.

When you read findings from the study you will note following key points:
  1. This problem is now officially rampant.  When you get to the level of 1 in 4 teens abusing prescription drugs, that means nearly every family with teens has a child with or a friend with this problem.  
  2. The #1 category of abused drugs in the US in teens are the stimulant medications such as Ritalin or Adderall.   About 1 in 8 teens in the US abuse stimulants.  Combining these drugs with others can be quite dangerous.
  3. It's not new, but it's newly big.  The rates are up 33% in the last 5 years!
  4. Kids use them to enhance performance, and to experiment. Consider skittle parties- where teens dump all the family's drugs into a bowl and pop away.
It wasn't that long ago that the use of steroids in sports was the great scandal- Barry Bonds may never enter the Baseball Hall of Fame for his alleged use of them.  The outrage was that great athletes would risk hurting their bodies to enhance their performance.

Today we see a parallel fad hitting, the phenomenon of performance enhancing in school.  The problem is similar to steroids, in both instances the drugs really do work.  Steroids boost batting averages, stimulants boost grade point averages.

The major difference is that nearly all prescription drugs also have quite good uses, but they should be limited to use under the direction of a licensed, thoughtful medical professional.

WHAT TO DO:
  1. Know that the abuse of prescription drugs demands the attention of every parent of a child over age 8-10.  With the rate hitting 1:4, no one can assume that their child is not at risk.
  2. Know that this is a very dangerous problem.  Children and teens really do come to harm from this practice.
  3. So, talk to you children, let them know a prescription drug is a chemical with power.  It's build to change the body, for real.   
  4. Let your children know that using prescription drugs without a prescription is common, and dangerous.  Let them know combining drugs can be deadly.
  5. **Keep every prescription drug in your home under control**  That means knowing where every such bottle is, and checking the pill count at regularly timed intervals, to make sure that the number of pills leaving the bottle does not exceed the prescribed amount or rate.
Obviously, the use of prescription drugs as prescribed can be very important.  

But, just as clearly, we have reached a point where every parent of an older child or adolescent should be talking to their child(ren) and monitoring every bottle of pills in the home.

Dr. Arthur Lavin




*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2013-04-01

Stomach Flu- Noro Takes over from Rota

Stomach Flu- Noro Takes over from Rota

This information is already known to most families in our community, but you might find out why it is so interesting.

This winter, even right now, we are experiencing an intense amount of stomach flu- that is, feeling sick, with fever, vomiting, and diarrhea.  Not everyone has all these symptoms,  but most do.  The illness lasts a few days, and the diarrhea can go on for as much as a week or two.  You can feel pretty lousy with this illness, and even get too dry.

Not long ago, there were hopes that the stomach flus of December through April would be gone.  Those stomach flus were once caused mainly by one virus, the rotavirus, and a vaccine was developed to end its impact.  As with other vaccines, the use of Rotavirus vaccine across the United States sharply reduced the incidence of infections of Rotavirus, and if all had gone according to plan, we would be seeing a sharp decrease in the rate of stomach flus this winter and early spring.

But nature has responded, with the rise of the Norovirus group, which includes what once was the cause of most of the non-Rotaviral stomach flu- the Norwalk agent.   As one might have guessed, when Rotavirus was knocked out of the running, Noroviruses stepped in.

Just last week, the New England Journal of Medicine reported that the Noroviruses now are causing more stomach flu than Rotavirus, and they causing enough trouble that rates of stomach flu in the United States are about the same as they were before the Rotavirus vaccine was given.

This is unfortunate, but it explains why there is still so much stomach flu around, even as Rotavirus has decreased.  It also is an argument against the use of the Rotavirus vaccine- it prevents a normally harmless illness, and over the course of the last few years, the illness it was designed to prevent is becoming more common as the Norovirus emerges and takes its chance to cause stomach flu.

Dr. Lavin



*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.