2012-09-24

Time to Put the Trampoline Away

Time to Put the Trampoline Away

For many years, it has been known that playing on a trampoline can hurt you, badly.  But the use of them has continued.

Today, the world's largest professional organization of pediatricians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, made a very clear recommendation:

Do Not Let Your Children Use a Trampoline- they can hurt, they can kill

http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/AAP-Advises-Against-Recreational-Trampoline-Use.aspx

The story of how trampolines came to be in our back yards is actually rather chilling.  

The sport of trampoline jumping was until some years ago, an official NCAA sport across American colleges.   But after a series of permanent brain and spinal cord injuries came to light, the NCAA banned trampolines.

When sales to colleges plummeted, the makers of trampolines decided it was time to market them to suburban families with back yards.  And, it worked.

Trampolines now dot the American back yard, and kids love bouncing on them.

The trouble is that a lot of kids ended getting hurt, many very seriously.
And, adding netting and padding has done nothing to reduce the chance of getting hurt.

In 2009, nearly 100,000 (that's right, 100,000) kids got hurt.
Nearly 20% of them hurt their neck, spine, or brain.

I have personally seen children suffer injuries that they never recover from.

Some advisories talk about making sure only one child is on the trampoline at a time or that skilled spotters are present.

The AAP, and Advanced Pediatrics, however, have a much simpler message-
Put the Trampoline Away
Do not allow your children to play on others' trampolines either.

We have known the danger too long, the call to end it is now clear,
The time  has come to put our kids first and put away the trampoline.

Dr. Arthur Lavin




*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2012-09-06

Turns out Formula Supplements have No Impact on Intelligence

Turns out Formula Supplements have No Impact on Intelligence

Every so often, something comes along that suggests that if we eat a certain thing, we will get smarter.  Remember fish, the brain food?  

This idea goes way back in our human history.  Ancient cultures prized eating certain animals, or parts of animals, thinking they contained special enhancing powers.  Eat a fierce lion's heart, and you would become braver.  Eat a smart animal's brain, and you would get smarter.

Not that long ago, infant formula manufacturers used our tendency to think this way to market their goods.

All infant formulas are under clinical and legal pressure to be nearly identical, they all aim towards the same goal- to be just like human breast milk.  This is why every infant formula on the market has essentially the same number of calories per ounce, grams of sodium, fat, and carbohydrate per ounce.

So if you make a formula, how do you pitch it as better than your competitor's, how do you imply it's competitive with breast milk.

One strategy was to add DHA and ARA to the formula.  Not much, not enough to change its basic nutritional value.  But enough to say, here is an infant food with extra DHA and ARA.  And the claim?
That if your infant eats extra DHA and ARA they will be smarter.

What is DHA and what is ARA?

DHA and ARA are types of fat called fatty acids.  It turns these fatty acids are important chemicals in the brain.  Much of the brain's material is made up of these compounds.
DHA is docosahexaenoic acid and it makes up 40% of all the polyunsaturated fatty acids of the human brain.
ARA is arachidonic acid which is abundant in the cell membranes of brain tissue.

Does eating more DHA and ARA in infancy make you smarter?

Well, researchers looked at a group of children who did and did not have extra DHA and ARA in infancy.
They found no difference in intelligence or cognitive function between those who ate more and those who ate less DHA or ARA.

Bottom Line

Like getting younger, we seem to all long for something that will make us smarter.

There are no chemicals or compounds that have proven able to make our babies smarter adults.

So beware of claims by infant formula manufacturers when they present small supplements to the formula for special purposes.

Dr. Arthur Lavin







*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

Stimulants- The Explosion, The Reasons, The Risk

Ritalin
Ritalin (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Stimulants- The Explosion, The Reasons, The Risk

Stimulants are a group of drugs whose most famous example is Ritalin.

We are currently living at a time when the use of these drugs is truly epidemic, so it makes sense to take a moment and look at why they are so popular, and whether there is any risk (there is).


The Basics of Stimulant Chemistry 
Let's begin with a few basics about these drugs.   All stimulants can trace their chemistry back to the king of all stimulating chemicals- adrenaline, also known as epinephrine.   Many of us are familiar with what adrenaline can do- it causes excitement.  Adrenaline makes your heart race, your mind clear, your breathing go deeper, your alertness soar, and overall makes you very, very excited.   But if you eat adrenaline, nothing happens, the gut destroys it before it can do anything.

For the last 5,000 years, the herb ma-huang has been used in China to give people the boost of adrenaline in an oral form.  The chemical in the herb is ephedrine, and it was from this chemical that in 1887 a chemist created a new chemical, amphetamine.  Amphetamine was not used in people until 1927, but it really took off.  Various forms of amphetamine were widely used by German, British, and American military during World War II.  Near the end of the war, in 1944, a chemist created a related chemical, methylphenidate, and he gave it to his wife to increase her low blood pressure.  His wife's name was Rita, so he called the new drug Ritalin.

Today, these two drugs, amphetamine and methylphenidate, account for nearly all the stimulant drugs used to treat people who struggle with paying attention.  They both work by stimulating the activity of various networks of nerves in the brain.  Each of these networks help control and manage a wide range of functions in the human mind.  The key network the stimulants stimulate is the dopamine network.   The nerves in the brain that use dopamine to communicate with each other are very much involved in the overall alertness of the brain, as well as a sense of reward and pleasure.   

Like many drugs, the chemicals amphetamine and methylphenidate are sold under many brand names.
Amphetamine is sold under two main brands today:  Adderall and Vyvanse.   Adderall is straight and pure amphetamine.  Vyvanse is amphetamine with an amino acid attached.  As long as the amino acid remains on, this drug will be inactive.  But if you swallow a pill of Vyvanse, your gut will cut off the amino acid leaving you with straight amphetamine, now activated and ready to go.  Therefore, Vyvanse (once digested) really is very much the same drug as Adderall.

In the methylphenidate side of the stimulants, there are a few more brands.  They include:  Ritalin, Concerta, Methylin, Metadate, Daytrana, and Focalin.  Focalin is what's called an isomer of methylphenidate.  It turns out most drugs and many chemicals in the body are like our hands, they come in right and left handed forms.  Both forms are identical in structure in all ways, but physically are mirror images of each other.  Focalin is the right-handed version of methylphenidate.   All the other  methylphenidates have both right and left handed versions of the drug in the pill.  So a 20 mg pill of Ritalin has 10 mg of Focalin in it (the right handed form of  methylphenidate) and 10 mg of the left handed form of  methylphenidate.  So aside from Focalin, all the other brands of  methylphenidate are exactly the same.  So 30 mg of Ritalin has exactly the same drug in it, really is the same thing,  as 30 mg of Concerta, or Methylin, or Metadate, or Daytrana.


Lots of Kids are On These Drugs
Recent surveys reveal that lots of kids are on these drugs.  Some years ago, one survey found that in the United States, 10% of boys age 10 take stimulants to get their homework done and do well in the classroom.

Just recently, an anthropologist conducted a study of undergrads at Case Western Reserve University.  The question was how many college students take the stimulant Adderall during midterm or finals weeks?
The answer reflects a new reality in the lives of our children- 93%.  That's right, nearly every college student at Case feels compelled to take the powerful drug Adderall in order to succeed.

What makes this incredible rate so amazing is that for the vast majority of these students, their use of Adderall is highly illegal.  Use of Adderall without a prescription is no different than scoring speed off the corner.  If the DEA finds out, you can easily spend many years in jail.  And yet, 93% of college undergraduates are using this drug, most without a prescription.

And, just in the last few years, we have seen the number of kids being prescribed stimulants really taking off.  The 10% of all American 10 year old boys is a rate quoted from several years ago, but that number is surely much higher now.  In our office, we are seeing many, many children being referred by their teachers to us, with the express directive to see about starting their child on stimulants to succeed in school.

Why Are Stimulants Being Used So Much Now?

There is no doubt at all, as noted above, that the use of stimulants is galloping ahead.  Why is that happening?

The most important reason is that they work.   There is little mystery about this fact.  It is a fact that if you stimulate or arouse the brain, it simply works better.  This is likely a fact for all animals, but is certainly how we humans are built.

It makes a lot of sense.  If you find yourself in real danger, your mind gets a little bath of adrenaline, and that causes it to get very excited.  Once aroused, the mind has the energy and resource to become amazingly focused, to laser in on the task at hand and put all mental resources on getting the job done, thoughts fly faster and with more purpose.  Think about a tiger suddenly jumping at you, all of a sudden your mind instantly organizes all thoughts and actions towards escape.  The level of focus created by this excitement is intense and extremely effective.  From the point of view of evolution, all humans whose minds do not focus at moments of danger tend to have a lot fewer kids than those whose minds do focus in response to a threat.

One could argue that all of us are descendants from humans whose brains got going and got focused when threatened.  And so our minds have this response to arousal and stimulation.  Of course, too much excitement and we move from focus to agitation, losing ability to get good work done.

We see the same thing happen with coffee.  A cup or two seems to help nearly everyone wake up, be more alert, and be more productive.  But too much coffee and our minds are whizzing into chaos.

So it is with the stimulants.  A bit of Concerta, or Adderall, or Ritalin, will improve the focus and efficacy of 80% of any group of people!  That's right, these drugs help nearly everyone do better work.

This has nothing to do with ADHD.  Yes, about 80% of people with ADHD who take stimulants will produce better work and get better grades.  But the point is that about 80% of all people, will do better work and get better grades when they take stimulants.

So the main reason that the use of stimulants is exploding is that they work.

The other reason is more cultural and complex.  The drugs work, but they have always worked, and known to work since the 1950's.  So why now in the 2010's is use booming so dramatically?   I suggest that one reason is the move towards describing our problems in thinking as medical conditions.  Another is the rise in complexity of thinking required to get good grades or do good work.

Going Medical
Consider a 6th grade boy named John.   He is doing OK in school, but he is not doing as well as he could.  He turns out to be a very, very bright young man, but seems bored in school.  He is often seen not paying attention in class, even looking out the window most days.  Parents find getting him to complete his homework is a great struggle.  Lately his grades have been slipping from mostly B's to more and more C's.
His teacher meets with the parents, and although stating she cannot diagnose medical conditions or advise on medical therapies, she suggests they look at the issue of ADHD and the option of medicating the child.
The parents go to their doctor and let him know the school is worried about his ability to focus and ask if he has ADHD.  A questionnaire is given to the parents and teachers and they confirm that he has many symptoms of ADHD, he is duly diagnosed with this mental health disorder or condition, and started on a stimulant.  He suddenly improves dramatically, now a model student with all straight A's.

This is very, very common story in America today.  But if you look at the story carefully, one could conceivably think of this in a different perspective.  Not that long ago, one could have thought about this as a case of boredom, or mismatched interests.  One could make the case that this 6th grader dislikes the subjects at hand and is defying the authorities in his life who want him to buckle down and do the assignments.  I am not going to say which perspective is right in this case, only that it is conceivable that an explanation other than a medical condition is possible to explain at least some situations where our children underperform.

Are Stimulants Addictive?  Can you stop taking them easily?  Do people tend to use them for a short time or long time?
The stimulants are addictive.  They tend to activate addiction when taken in high doses, high enough to get high, that is.  We do not see addiction develop very often in children taking them to enhance performance in school.  The doses are low enough to avoid causing a high.
If addiction is not activated it is a very simple matter to stop, one simply stops taking the pills.  Normally very little if anything happens when you stop taking stimulants, even after many years.

Yet, curiously, most people who take stimulants for better focus tend to take them for many years, often many decades.  Again, the reason is likely obvious.  If you take a medication and on it you find your grades and work success soar, why would you stop?  Why return to days of failure?  The answer is for most people, not to return to failure, but to keep taking the stimulant.


If Stimulants Work, Doesn't that Prove ADHD is present?
But what about the fact this child's work got so much better on the medication?  Doesn't that prove he has ADHD?  The full answer is, no.
Remember, as noted above, about 80% of all humans will find their brain working better, often dramatically better, on these medications, whether they have ADHD, or not.

If Stimulants Work so Well for So Many, Why not Have Everyone on Them?
This is a very important question.
If these drugs were truly perfectly safe, I would be in favor of their very wide use.  I would actually have no problem with 93% of college students taking them during exam week.  They would turn out to be simply a stronger version of stimulants like coffee, just as safe, and more effective.

Sadly, the stimulants are not free of serious risk.
All stimulants carry a set of minor and major risks.   Minor side effects are only minor because they go away if you stop use of the medication.  Major side effects are major because they tend to be permanent.
The key minor side effects are:  loss of appetite with real weight loss, disrupted sleep, headache, stomach ache, sensation of altered mind.
The three key major side effects are:  Diminished final adult height, tics, and cardiac effects.
  • Height  It is estimated that a number of kids (not an issue if you are already fully grown) will lose 1-2 inches of final adult height if they take a stimulant regularly over time.
  • Tics  Tics are twitches of one or several sets of muscles.  They can be very small, like a very partial wink of one eyelid every few days, or very severe, involving arms and legs and vocalizations every few seconds.  Although proof is not yet complete, there are indications that use of stimulants can increase the chance of a person developing tics, permanently.  
  • Cardiac effects There are two very serious risks here, these are the most dangerous aspects of use of stimulants.  The chair of the Cleveland Clinic Department of Cardiology is Dr. Steven Nissen.  Widely regarded as one of the world's top cardiologists, Dr. Nissen voiced his concerns about the impact use of stimulants would have on a heart as chair of an FDA Panel looking into this concern.  His perspective was published in the world's leading medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine   http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp068049
    • Sudden Death.  There are a number of children and adults who suddenly died after taking a dose of stimulant medication.  This appears to be an event limited to individuals with rare abnormalities of their heart's electrical conduction system.  The problem is that most people with these rare electrical conduction systems do not know they have them.  A screening EKG prior to use of these medications could help prevent some, but not all of these tragic events.
    • Long-term Wear and Tear- the Risk of Congestive Heart Failure later in life  Those who study how congestive heart failure develops use the fact that simply dripping amphetamine on an animal heart long enough will create congestive heart failure.  There are reports in the medical literature of some older adults developing heart failure when used with amphetamine.  Of much greater concern is that we are currently embarked on a rather worrisome experiment.                         As noted above, people who benefit from use of stimulants (about 80% of everyone who might try them), tend to stay on them for many years, even decades.  We now have placed millions and millions of children on stimulants, and they will likely be taking them daily for many, many years.  No one, including myself, who is currently prescribing these medications to children, will likely be in practice or even alive, when these children grow into later middle age.  We simply do not know what the rate of heart failure will be in this group of many millions of children once they turn 40, 50, or 60, or more years old.  But the experience with animal research clearly establishes the possibility that long-term, daily use of stimulants could set up a very real risk of very serious heart disease later in life.
Bottom Line
  • The use of stimulants is rising, very rapidly, and across populations that have nothing to do with ADHD
  • The notion that children who do not pay attention in school have a medical condition has grown and continues to increase dramatically
  • Stimulants come in two major forms- amphetamine and methylphenidate.  They have a known set of side effects
  • Stimulants work very well, for everyone.  In any group of people, about 80% will see improvements in their life when they use stimulants.
  • The biggest question mark on the risk of using stimulants is their long term impact on the heart.  We do not know what that might be, but the chance that it could be very significant needs to be answered.
Putting all this together, at Advanced Pediatrics we only prescribe stimulants with the greatest of care.  We take the following steps to ensure your children are exposed to the risk of stimulants only when necessary and only with your awareness of the risk:
  1. We try to only use stimulant medication for the diagnosis of ADHD.  If a child has trouble in school, we start with finding out why, not with a therapy.  Causes might include other cognitive dysfunctions (e.g., dyslexia), emotional troubles, relationship concerns, or other problems.  So first, see if the problem is really ADHD or some other cause.
  2. We try to use interventions free of side effects first.  Options include ADHD coaching, counseling, and cognitive training programs.
  3. Use of stimulants should be used only if the impairment is very serious.
We live in an era when 93% of some college's students use Adderall to get a good grade!  But these medications are not entirely free of risk.  Advanced Pediatrics will continue to keep you informed as we learn more about how the brain works and how we can most safely improve how our children's minds work.

Dr. Arthur Lavin












*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.
Enhanced by Zemanta

2012-08-30

The Return of Whooping Cough

The Return of Whooping Cough

In today's New England Journal of Medicine, one of the country's top experts in infectious diseases, James D. Cherry, MD, presents the fact that we are right now in the middle of the worst outbreak of whooping cough in 50 years.  There is so much whooping cough, or pertussis, around, that we are at levels approaching a full 1/3 of the rates seen before the pertussis vaccine was invented!

So what is pertussis, and what about our current epidemic?

Pertussis is an infection caused by a certain bacteria called Bordetella pertussis.  This bacteria infects mainly the lungs and airways (e.g., nose, throat).  The older you are, the milder the infection, so in young infants it can be quite dangerous.   

For infants less than 2 months of age, about 1 in 100 actually will not survive a bout of pertussis.  For infants ages 2-11 months old, the chance of dying from this infection is a bit less than 1 in 200.  For older children and adults, this infection causes mainly misery, death is quite rare from it.  

The main problem older children and adults have from pertussis is cough.  The cough is very persistent and can last several months.  In fact, in the article by Dr. Cherry, the claim is made that if an adolescent or adult is coughing for more than 3 weeks, the chance the cause is pertussis is 13-20%.  Screening a large number of adolescents and adults has found about 1-6% have had a recent case of pertussis.  Other problems it can cause the older child and adult include pneumonia, broken ribs from coughing, fainting, pneumonia, and insomnia.  Rarely it can cause seizures and dysfunction of the brain.

The number of people with pertussis is at a 50 year high, why?  One reason is that it is easier to test for it, and more doctors are aware that older kids and adults get it frequently.  So more tests are being done and more people found to have it.  

Another more troubling reason is that in an effort to make immunizations cause less fever and discomfort, the pertussis vaccine was weakened in the 1980's.  This was the move from whole cell to acellular pertussis vaccines.  The acellular variety is why the initial has a small "a" in it.   Immunizations to protect against pertussis are combined with tetanus and diphtheria vaccines.  The original version is DTP, the newer acellular version then is, DTaP.  The adult version is called TDaP.  Both are the acellular, weaker pertussis vaccine.

Yet another concern is that the pertussis bacteria, B. pertussis, is a clever enemy.  Even getting a full infection with this germ offers no or little immunity, you can get this illness over and over.  This is the main reason the immunizations for pertussis don't last very long.  After the first pertussis immunization, you are only protected for a few weeks.  After 5 such immunizations spanning the first 5 years of life, the immunization lasts only 7 or so years.  This is why the TDaP is being urged as a vaccine at age 12 and in adulthood.

Bottom Line
Whooping cough, or pertussis, is back.  We are in the midst of the biggest epidemic of it in 50 years.  Right now, up to 20% of all older children and adults with a cough lingering more than a couple of weeks have it.
This illness causes a lot of misery in older kids and adults, but is actually very dangerous to the life of infants.
What to do?  
  1. Make sure everyone in your entire family is up to date on pertussis immunization.
  2. If you have a cough lasting more than 2 weeks, the fact that a pertussis epidemic is on, means we are going to test for it more often.

Dr. Arthur Lavin




*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2012-05-13

Parenting: Attachment, Nurturing, and Guiding

Parenting:  Attachment, Nurturing, and Guiding

Time magazine featured a cover photo that could have not possibly made breast-feeding more provocative.

A young mother was dressed in tight, stretchy clothes, with one breast out and being suckled by a three year old boy in a nice suit, standing up, on a stool.

Not one of these features is typical of the usual breast-feeding scenario except for the fact that it included a mother and child and that the mother was young.  More typically, children are breast fed in a setting of more quiet intimacy, cuddled, out of the glare of the paparazzi, with neither mother nor child dressed for business success.

So the first comment on the Time magazine cover is that it was designed in nearly every aspect to be provocative, and it worked, here we are talking about it!

But it also gives us the opportunity to look at a popular philosophy of parenting, attachment parenting.

Attachment parenting derives from a very strong and valuable tradition of parenting often referred to as nurturing parenting.   Nurturing parenting is based on the stance that the key role of parenting is to offer nurturing care and love to our children.  It has its roots in the studies of childhood that helped launch the modern era of psychology in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.  It is worth noting that one of Sigmund Freud's greatest observations was that events that take place in infancy and childhood can have profound consequences in that person's adult life.  This was a powerful and earth-shattering observation at the time it was made, even though most of us would consider it an obvious fact today.  From Freud, the concept grew in the hands of the great English pediatrician and psychoanalyst, D.W. Winnicott and his intellectual heirs, including the wonderful Haim Ginott and Selma Fraiberg.   

Nurturing parenting also was a reaction to the strictures of authoritarian parenting, a stance that cared little for the thoughts and feelings of children and instead placed most value on the imposition of adult authority and its rules.  This was the dominant mode of parenting in post- World War II middle class America and remained so until the rise of nurturing parenting with the publication of Dr. Benjamin Spock's seminal book and the work of Dr. T. Berry Brazelton.

I was honored to have been trained in my understanding of child development by Dr. Brazelton and had the opportunity to personally observe the power of loving responsivity to bring out the best in children and their parents.  The work of Dr. Brazelton and others profoundly changed the way America raises its children.
Where once toilet training was forced on children at young ages with physical punishment taking place when they failed to pee or poop on command, now toilet training is left mainly up to the child, to be approached and managed as they see fit and when they choose to do so.

This revolution took place in the late 1960's and not much has really changed in the philosophy of American parenting since those days.

From this perspective the work of the Sears family sits firmly in the current traditions.  In this perspective, parents are expected to care very deeply about their child's needs and desires, to be knowledgeable about how these change from one phase of childhood to another across development, to be responsive from moment to moment to the child's emotional abilities and states.  We know from much study and research that the child gains much from this approach, it helps and it works.

But we have also found that there is one piece missing from this picture, and that is guidance.  One of the unspoken assumptions about the nurturing stance of parenting is that the child will be profoundly grateful, that in return for an expert, caring, and responsive parent, the child will also be caring and responsive.  And why not?  After all, if someone was attending to your every need, wouldn't you take kindly to them?

And yet, we have observed that starting at about 18 months of age, this is not the case for nearly every family.  For some striking reason, nearly every child sometime between 18 and 24 months of age starts doing something no nurturing parent expects or looks for, they start picking fights.  This is no casual event. Recent studies in human evolution and cultural anthropology demonstrate beyond a doubt that this provocative behavior is programmed to emerge at that age, likely as a central feature of the emergence of human consciousness which actually also happens at that age.

This behavior appears important to help children learn what rules really count, how to negotiate, how to learn to problem solve.  In short, the provocative nature of the 1-2 year old serves many important purposes.  

It is this set of behaviors, however, in which our current models of nurturing parenting find their limits.  A careful look at the approaches of attachment parenting will also find a substantive approach to these provocations lacking as well.   At its heart attachment parenting suggests that the stronger the attachment the better the parenting.  This is a powerful fact, but should not be the entire extent of what parents bring to their children.  It is true that without good attachment there can be no good parenting.  But that does not mean that attachment is the only activity parents should pursue.

Love is at the heart of parenting, but it is not the case that simply loving will solve all problems.  What if your child asks how tall your father is, to take a silly example, it would not help matters to answer that question with only a lot of love.  The love would be welcome, but not actually help your child deal with the issue at hand.  So it is with the common provocations of young children over 18 months of age.  As noted, children at this age are actually built to provoke, and they do.  The most common issues they test and push their parents on are well known to all:
1.  Discipline- breaking rules to see what parents will do
2.  Food fights- challenging parental desires on what they will eat
3.  Toilet training- resisting the leap to caring for their own poop and pee
4.  Sleeping all night- pushing parents to wake up several times a night to be with them

In our experience, what is at the heart of these behaviors is the child's hunger for guidance.


The cover of Time magazine sparks the wrong controversy in our opinion.  For too long the nation has been consumed with a false choice.  The choice placed before us seems to force us to choose to either be too harsh or too lenient with our children.  Often the choice is expressed as whether we will love our children or make them cry.  But this dichotomy places all parents in a very uncomfortable position because both choices turn out to be inadequate to the task as hand.  Of course, taking as a goal to make your child cry is a nonsensical position to take, it has no value, and no one we know ever actually adopts this choice.  The other choice, to love your child, is extreme in the other direction, that is, it is what we all do.  There is no thoughtfulness in this choice, it is more of starting point than a level of skill and ability attained.

To our mind the best stance to take on parenting can be put very simply, though achieving it can be challenging.  That stance is:  yes, love your child, but do not stop there, also guide them.
We fully support the nurturing model of parenting and promote it.  But the challenging 2 year old demands more than love, he or she demand guidance.  They want to be taught, to be led, to be engaged.
We develop this concept more fully in our book on parenting, Who's the Boss? Moving Families from Conflict to Collaboration.  But it is clear that if parents do not learn how to guide, their children will continue to demand this from them, so parents might as well take it upon themselves to learn how to teach, to guide, as well as nourish the wonderful role of loving and nurturing.

And so we ask parents to look beyond the cover of Time magazine, and the attachment model of parenting. The cover of Time offers only provocation, and the attachment model of parenting only comfort.  We know that parenting is not about provocation and although its foundation is entirely love, it cannot stop there.

Dr. Arthur Lavin










*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2012-03-16


Having trouble reading this posting? View it in your browser.
 
 
Invite your first-time pregnant friends
to join us for
New Mother's Day
 
As many of you know, Advanced Pediatrics has been collaborating on projects with Berg’s Baby & Teen Furniture for some time. Together, we have even published the book “The 5 Most Important Things to Do During Pregnancy to Ensure the Future Health of Your New Baby.” Berg’s has been recognized as one of the nation’s top baby furniture stores.
 
We are pleased to announce the addition of Alexandria School as the newest member of our collaborative association. Located in Solon, Alexandria School brings the best in training for Newborn Care Specialists and Nannies as well as offering courses to parents and parents-to-be. Alexandria School is one of four schools certified nanny schools in The United States.
 
In contrast to trends in the marketplace, where relationships are cast aside in elusive pursuit of efficiency, the core mission of each of our businesses is creating and nurturing a strong relationship with our clients and customers. We three take pride in basing our activities on thinking about what you need and being as knowledgeable and responsive as possible.
 
On May 12, we join forces to present New Mother’s Daythe first in a series of offerings to the community. The focus is on first-time pregnant women. We ask you to forward this invitation to any and all of your friends who meet that criterion. And, of course, feel free to link up through Facebook.
 
Thanks for your cooperation.
 
Here is the agenda for New Mother’s Day.
 
Topics:
      • Five steps that let your newborn sleep safe
      • How to create a green nursery and why it might be important
        to your baby’s health              
      • How to evaluate and choose the best way to  care for your baby
        when you go back to work
 
Guest Experts:
      Carolyn Stulberg • Alexandria School
      Dr. Arthur Lavin • Advanced Pediatrics
      David Brodsky • Berg’s Baby & Teen Furniture
 
When:
      Saturday, May 12th
      10:00 am to noon                                                             
            10:00 am • Meet and greet, refreshments
            10:30 am • Presentations
            11:30 am • Questions and answers
 
Where:
      Alexandria School
      28500 Miles Road, Suite P
      Solon OH
      The first building west of Miles Farmer’s Market
      all the way at the back
 
Registration and more information:
      440-914-0044 • Alexandria School
 
More information:
      216-591-1515 • Advanced Pediatrics
      440-585-2374 • Berg’s Baby & Teen Furniture
 
 
Dr. Arthur Lavin
Dr. Julie Hertzer
Ms. Kelley Muldoon Rieger, APRN, PNP
 
Friend us on Facebook
 
 








*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.

2012-03-07

Cavities are Back in Kids

Cavities are Back in Kids- Time to Act

It's a curious thing.  For most of our lives, the chance our preschoolers would get a cavity has been dropping, at times dramatically.  But now, for the first time in 40 years, the trend is reversing.  In a dramatic turn around, our 2-5 year old children are now more likely not only to have cavities, but to have so much tooth decay that general anesthesia is needed to repair 6-12 teeth at one time!

It's worth thinking about this development for a moment.  Not too long ago, dentists were getting close to celebrate the end of tooth decay in young children.  But that moment appears to have vanished.  In its place is a shocking epidemic of very severe cavities in pre-schoolers.  Unlike the cavities seen in kids 30-40 years ago when money protected against cavities, this epidemic afflicts rich and poor alike.

No one knows exactly why things have gotten so much worse so rapidly.  But here are a few theories:
  1. The rise of juice.  Today more than ever, an expectation has been established that what you drink should be exciting.  
  2. The rise of sweet snacks.  Again, that excitement enticement.   The combination of juice and sugar snacks causes a tremendous bolt of bacterial growth in the mouth with every juice pack and fruit roll up.  When sugar is eaten, the saliva in the mouth turns very acidic for about 20 minutes.  Acid dissolves enamel, which can weaken all of a pre-schoolers teeth very well, opening the door to multiple cavities.
  3. The rise of bottle water.  No real reason this should have happened, beyond successful marketing.  But the move towards bottled water has effectively dropped the protective power that fluoride in tap water offers.  Flouride blocks cavities.  Dropping fluoride invites cavities.
  4. The fall of toothbrushing.  Once a tooth appears, a child should have their teeth brushed twice a day with a small amount of fluoride toothpaste, no more than a pea size.  This action drops the chance of getting tooth decay.  Some kids don't like doing it, but if parents go along with that preference, they effectively increase the chance that cavities will appear.
Put it all together, and we have a very good scenario for a big jump in cavities, a jump that is here.  

Bottom Line:
Cavities, once nearly vanquished from the lives of our young children, are now back with a vengeance.  Preschoolers now are developing multiple cavities, many requiring general anesthesia for repair.
Take these four steps to protect your young children from this happening:
  • Only give your children water to drink, with the only exception being skim milk.
  • Make sure the water you give is tap water, not bottle water.  
  • If your tap water has no fluoride, make sure your children get fluoride supplements
  • Snacks should be fruits and vegetables, only.
  • Brush every child's teeth twice a day with a tiny bit of fluoride toothpaste
These simple steps will not only protect your child's teeth, but their overall health, too.

Dr. Arthur Lavin

*Disclaimer* The comments contained in this electronic source of information do not constitute and are not designed to imply that they constitute any form of individual medical advice. The information provided is purely for informational purposes only and not relevant to any person's particular medical condition or situation. If you have any medical concerns about yourself or your family please contact your physician immediately. In order to provide our patients the best uninfluenced information that science has to offer,we do not accept samples of drugs, advertising tchotchkes, money, food, or any item from outside vendors.